![]() |
Wireless News Aggregation |
|
|
Welcome Back To The Wireless Messaging News
The Power of Millimeter Wave - Verizon
Verizon
We believe 5G is an exponential improvement to what we have today. This year is the year that we’re going to offer a commercial product to our customers. In millimeter wave we have a massive amount of bandwidth. We’re seeing testing speeds of over a gigabit per second as well as extremely low latency. It’s really high frequency so everybody thinks it doesn’t go very far, but it’s a really big height and so that’s what allows you to gain the super-fast speeds. We’re here on top of this parking garage. We’re 3,000 feet away from our radio node. The cool thing about this is we did not move the radio node, it’s pointing down to serve the customers in that area. But here, even 3,000 feet away we’re still getting gig speeds. So we’ve driven about a 3rd of a mile away from the radio node, it’s located over there behind the trees. We’re still getting very good speeds even though we have foliage in between. Our radio node is tucked in behind those apartments over there. The signal is actually bouncing off of the buildings. Even at this distance with non-line of sight, we’re still getting almost a gig. We’re here doing our in building test. This right here is our CPE equipment. We’re going through the wall, over here, also through the window & our radio is way out there at the tower. And we’re still getting really good speeds & signal. Essentially what beam-forming does is compensate for any signal loss by switching automatically to the strongest beam. The selection of the beam is done instantaneously so you get really solid coverage using millimeter wave spectrum. What we’ve learned over the past year is that the millimeter wave signal is much more resilient than anyone’s expected. This is going out to customers & it’s got the Verizon name behind it, so it has to be reliable & robust. Right now we’re only using half of our spectrum. I’m excited to get this build out completed & unleash the full potential of 5G. [source]
Prism-IPX Systems
is growing and they are looking for more good software developers with communications experience. Additional information is available on their web site.
|
This doesn't mean that nothing is ever published here that mentions a US political party—it just means that the editorial policy of this newsletter is to remain neutral on all political issues. We don't take sides.
A new issue of the Wireless Messaging Newsletter is posted on the web each week. A notification goes out by e-mail to subscribers on most Fridays around noon central US time. The notification message has a link to the actual newsletter on the web. That way it doesn’t fill up your incoming e-mail account. There is no charge for subscription and there are no membership restrictions. Readers are a very select group of wireless industry professionals, and include the senior managers of many of the world’s major Paging and Wireless Messaging companies. There is an even mix of operations managers, marketing people, and engineers — so I try to include items of interest to all three groups. It’s all about staying up-to-date with business trends and technology.
I regularly get readers’ comments, so this newsletter has become a community forum for the Paging, and Wireless Messaging communities. You are welcome to contribute your ideas and opinions. Unless otherwise requested, all correspondence addressed to me is subject to publication in the newsletter and on my web site. I am very careful to protect the anonymity of those who request it. I spend the whole week searching the Internet for news that I think may be of interest to you — so you won’t have to. This newsletter is an aggregator — a service that aggregates news from other news sources. You can help our community by sharing any interesting news that you find.
Editorial Opinion pieces present only the opinions of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any of advertisers or supporters. This newsletter is independent of any trade association. I don't intend to hurt anyone's feelings, but I do freely express my own opinions.
We need your help.
|
GLENAYRE INFRASTRUCTUREI would like to recommend Easy Solutions for Support of all Glenayre Paging Equipment. This Texas company is owned and operated by Vaughan Bowden. I have known Vaughan for over 35 years. Without going into a long list of his experience and qualifications, let me just say that he was the V.P. of Engineering at PageNet which was—at that time—the largest paging company in the world. So Vaughan knows Paging. GTES is no longer offering support contracts. GTES was the original group from Vancouver that was setup to offer support to customers that wanted to continue with the legacy Glenayre support. Many U.S. customers chose not to use this service because of the price and the original requirement to upgrade to version 8.0 software (which required expensive hardware upgrades, etc.). Most contracts ended as of February 2018. If you are at all concerned about future support of Glenayre products, especially the “king of the hill” the GL3000 paging control terminal, I encourage you to talk to Vaughan about a service contract and please tell him about my recommendation. |
IT'S FREE * required field If you would like to subscribe to the newsletter just fill in the blanks in the form above, and then click on the “Subscribe” button. There is no charge for subscription and there are no membership restrictions. It’s all about staying up-to-date with business trends and technology.
|
![]() |
Advertiser Index
|
|
Source: |
MissionCritical Communications April-May 2018: 20-25 |
Paging Transmitters 150/900 MHz The RFI High Performance Paging Transmitter is designed for use in campus, city, state and country-wide paging systems. Designed for use where reliable simulcast systems where RF signal overlap coverage is critical.
Built-in custom interface for Prism-IPX ipBSC Base Controller for remote control, management and alarm reporting.
Prism-IPX Systems LLC.
11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
Back To PagingStill The Most Reliable Protocol For Wireless Messaging!
|
|
|
The Wireless Messaging News
The Board of Advisor members are people with whom I have developed a special rapport, and have met personally. They are not obligated to support the newsletter in any way, except with advice, and maybe an occasional letter to the editor.
Can You Help The Newsletter?
You can help support The Wireless Messaging News by clicking on the PayPal Donate button above. It is not necessary to be a member of PayPal to use this service.
Newspapers generally cost
A donation of $50.00 would certainly help cover a one-year period. If you are wiling and able, please click on the PayPal Donate button above.
|
Facebook Just Made Two-Factor Authentication
|
Source: |
Voluntary Newsletter Supporters By Donation |
Kansas City
Premium Newsletter Supporter
Premium Newsletter Supporter
Canyon Ridge CommunicationsPremium Newsletter Supporter
ProPage Inc.Newsletter Supporter
Metropolitan Communications
Newsletter Supporter
e*Message Wireless Information Services Europe
Newsletter Supporter
Lekkerkerk, NetherlandsNewsletter Supporter
Donate to have your company's logo added.
|
Incyte Capital Holdings LLC
|
Prism-IPX Systems |
![]()
Critical Messaging that works
Secure . . . Dependable . . . and Encrypted |
|
Product Support Services, Inc. |
Repair and Refurbishment Services
Product Support Services, Inc.
|
For Sale – Apollo Pilot XP A28 Alpha Numeric Pagers w/Charging Cradle
|
Internet Protocol Terminal
The IPT accepts Internet or serial messaging using various protocols and can easily convert them to different protocols, or send them out as paging messages. An ideal platform for hospitals, on-site paging applications, or converting legacy systems to modern protocols.
Additional/Optional Features
Prism-IPX Systems LLC.
11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
|
Leavitt Communications |
|
Paging Data Receiver PDR-4 The PDR-4 is a multi-function paging data receiver that decodes paging messages and outputs them via the serial port, USB or Ethernet connectors. Designed for use with Prism-IPX ECHO software Message Logging Software to receive messages and log the information for proof of transmission over the air, and if the data was error free.
Prism-IPX Systems LLC.
11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
|
Wireless Network Planners
|
|
Remote AB Switches ABX-1 switches are often used at remote transmitter sites to convert from old, outdated and unsupported controllers to the new modern Prism-IPX ipBSC base station controllers. Remotely switch to new controllers with GUI commands. ABX-1
ABX-3 switches are widely used for enabling or disabling remote equipment and switching I/O connections between redundant messaging systems. ABX-3
Common Features:
Prism-IPX Systems LLC.
11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
|
Leavitt Communications |
|
United Tower Alliance: Drone Inspections – The First National Solution!The United Tower Alliance (UTA) is comprised of 18 industry leading tower contractors. These local performance partners conduct detailed UAV tower inspections anywhere in the USA. The UTA provides local operators with a client centered single point of contact. “The UTA was formed in 2017, because a group of industry experts wanted to bring high value to the telecommunications industry,” said Ean Mercer, Managing Partner. “Our professionals are world class firms whose operations are already trained to deliver tower services. We just added great useable data and consistent deliverables to their unparalleled safety.” Why utilize UTA tower inspections? Our professional grade UAVs are faster, safer and more cost-effective when properly flown by a trained pilot. UTA’s operators can accomplish in hours what a traditional inspection might discover with two climbers doing a full day’s work. “We wanted to provide a safe, efficient and cost-effective choice as a place to start your infrastructure checkup,” said Mercer. “We’re also committed to consistency. Whether a project is completed in Charlotte, Chicago or Chino, the deliverables are identical, never compromising quality.” So, the UTA has local expertise and a national footprint? Yes! Each “local area” of the United States is cared for by seasoned wireless infrastructure firms with vast knowledge of the market and distinctive traits for that geography. In an emergency, a UTA partner can be on-site quickly, anywhere in the country. The company also offers a single point of contact for each customer to streamline the process. “It’s really best of both worlds. Customers get a local professional who knows their area and navigates any quirks that arise. However, they still have direct access to the UTA NOC, so organizationally there’s a culture that demands delivery of a truly high-quality client experience,” said Mercer. But anyone can fly a drone, right? “There are novice drone enthusiasts, but our belief is that much more training and experience is necessary to deliver a quality inspection report,” said Mercer. That’s why all UAV Operators working with UTA are trained above and beyond the FAA’s Part 107 requirements. “Most organizations stop at Part 107, but that’s where we begin,” said Mercer. “Our pilots all receive specialized training that exceeds government standards and is tailored specifically for tower inspection flights.” The company conducts rigorous advanced training through the UTA Flight Academy. In addition, all UTA Performance Partners are participants in the NATE/STAR® Initiative. Safety and quality are never out of style with our pilots! How are the UTA’s deliverables unique? “We deliver accurate data quickly to our customers,” said Mercer. “Our secure platform delivers images and data that can be viewed anywhere and used immediately after the client logs on to the secure portal.” he added. The UTA’s custom-built operator portal allows use on site and ensures completion of each part of the client task list. This integrity features a user ease and easy to view format that serves the pilot as well as the client. “Our mission is to serve the need for quality tower inspections on a greater scale, with flexibility, consistency, and professional expertise. UTA brings actionable data to the customer in almost real time – we work at the speed of wireless,” said Mercer. The customer can effortlessly view a report of what they own and its condition on the tower. UTA is headquartered in the west but our performance partners serve you across the entire USA, coast to coast. Wherever you are. . . We’re already there! For more information or to schedule an inspection, visit www.flyuta.com.
Ergen’s Planned $10B 5G Spend is Big News at Connect (X)Charlie Ergen, chairman and co-founder of DISH discussed his company’s foray into the wireless business in Charlotte, NC at Connect (X). He told attendees, “There are incumbents who do a great job connecting to your phone but the future is going to be connecting to machines. How do you build that network?” In an on-stage interview with former FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell, now a partner at law firm Cooley, Ergen said: “We know how to partner with people who know more than we do,” said Ergen. “We have signed some master lease agreements with tower companies,” mentioning a $500 million to $1 billion buildout in the initial phase. Phase two will be a cost of “at least $10 billion,” Ergen said, to build a national wireless network – the first time that number has been made public, according to two WIA sources at the show. The initial phase consists of a national wireless network focused on narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT), with phase two expected to be a 5G network. The large dollars amounts being discussed excited tower and other executives at the show. “An investment of this much money is very good news for the wireless infrastructure industry,” said Wireless Infrastructure President/CEO Jonathan Adelstein, in an interview with Inside Towers yesterday. Dish has ordered radios from some vendors at the show and Ergen said his company plans to begin testing the network this fall. “Once we start construction, then we start planning for [a] 5G network. The 600 MHZ spectrum is not cleared for us nationwide until 2020,” said Ergen. He acknowledged: “We don’t have any customers and we are not as knowledgeable as people who are already in this business. We’re incentivized to reinvent ourselves,” he said, adding it took five years to build the DISH business, competing against Direct Broadcast Satellite, TCI and others. Now DISH has 13 million customers. By Leslie Stimson, Inside Towers Washington Bureau Chief |
Source: | Inside Towers newsletter | Courtesy of the editor of Inside Towers. |
BloostonLaw Newsletter |
Selected portions [sometimes more — sometimes less] of the BloostonLaw Telecom Update and/or the BloostonLaw Private Users Update — newsletters from the Law Offices of Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens, Duffy & Prendergast, LLP — are reproduced in this section of The Wireless Messaging News with kind permission from the firm. The firm's contact information is included at the end of this section of the newsletter.
REMINDER: ISP Transparency Disclosure Requirement Effective June 11On June 11, the FCC’s transparency disclosure requirements for ISPs will go into effect. The requirements, which were adopted in the Restoring Internet Freedom Order that rolled back Title II classification of Internet service and eliminated Net Neutrality requirements. Specifically, Section 8.3 of the FCC’s rules requires anyone engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service to publicly disclose accurate information regarding the network management practices, performance, and commercial terms of their broadband Internet access services the purpose of meeting the transparency requirements, the FCC has opened an optional online web portal. See the article below for more information. BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens, Gerry Duffy, and Mary Sisak. HeadlinesFCC Announces Tentative Agenda for June Open MeetingOn May 18, the FCC issued a Public Notice announcing the tentative agenda for its upcoming June Open Meeting, which is currently scheduled for June 7. The FCC publicly releases the draft text of each item expected to be considered at this Open Commission Meeting with the exception of items involving specific, enforcement-related matters. One-page cover sheets are included in the public drafts to help summarize each item. Links to these materials are embedded in the text below. At the meeting, the FCC will consider:
Open Meetings are streamed live at www.fcc.gov/live and can be followed on social media with #OpenMtgFCC. BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens, Gerry Duffy, Mary Sisak, and Sal Taillefer. Comment Sought on CenturyLink Petition for Over-the-Top VoIP Traffic CompensationOn May 18, the FCC issued a Public Notice inviting interested parties to comment on a Petition for Declaratory Ruling filed by CenturyLink Inc. (CenturyLink) on May 11, 2018. Comments are due June 18 and reply comments are due July 3. In its Petition, CenturyLink urges the Commission to “complete the remand” from the Court of Appeals and to resolve the underlying dispute regarding the proper interpretation of its rules. Previously, the Commission issued a Declaratory Ruling in 2015 to address disagreements over the application of the VoIP symmetry rule to long distance providers delivering traffic by partnering with "over the top" VoIP service providers that do not have last-mile physical connections to end users. In the Declaratory Ruling, the Commission determined that over-the-top VoIP providers and their partnering LECs provide the functional equivalent of end-office switching services and are entitled to impose end office switching charges. In 2016, the D.C. Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the Declaratory Ruling “for further explanation.” BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens, Gerry Duffy, Mary Sisak, and Sal Taillefer. FCC Establishes Portal for ISP Transparency DisclosuresOn May 21, the FCC released a Public Notice announcing the establishment of a portal for Internet service provider (ISP) transparency disclosures. The portal will be available for both ISPs submitting their disclosures to the FCC and consumers searching for any disclosures submitted to the FCC on May 29. The Restoring Internet Freedom Order, wherein the FCC adopted ISP transparency reporting requirements, becomes effective on June 11, 2018. The revised transparency rule — 47 CFR § 8.3 — requires ISPs to publicly disclose information about their service in one of two ways — by providing the disclosure on a publicly available, easily accessible website or by submitting it to the FCC for posting. ISPs choosing to submit their required disclosures to the FCC should do so electronically, in a format that is accessible to people with disabilities, through http://www.fcc.gov/isp-disclosures. An ISP that does not submit its required disclosure to the FCC through this portal will be deemed as having elected to provide it on a publicly available, easily accessible website of its choosing. An ISP that submits its required disclosure to the FCC and later elects to provide it on a publicly available, easily accessible website of its choosing should inform the FCC of this change by filing via the FCC portal a clear statement of the change, including the website where consumers can find the required disclosure. BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens, Gerry Duffy, and Sal Taillefer. FCC Releases Updated Version of MF-II Eligible Area MapOn May 22, the FCC released an updated version of the map of areas presumptively eligible for Mobility Fund Phase II (MF-II) support. The updated map is available at www.fcc.gov/maps/mobility-fund-ii-initial-eligible-areas-map/ . This version of the map also shows an update to the areas presumptively ineligible for MF-II support due to qualifying, unsubsidized coverage reported by a single mobile provider. The updated map reflects adjustments to underlying coverage and subsidy data, resulting in an increase in area presumptively eligible for support in the MF-II auction. The updates do not alter the eligibility status of 99.87 percent of the total area (both eligible and ineligible areas) shown on the first version of the map. Specifically, the updated version of the map reflects three changes to coverage and subsidy data. First, in order to adjust for inconsistencies between U.S. Census data and wire center boundary data, the updated version of the map now incorporates subsidies for small portions of certain wire centers that cross into an adjacent state, thereby increasing presumptively eligible area in additional states. Second, staff reprocessed the map data for Kentucky and a portion of Tennessee to account for corrected subsidy assignments in those areas. Third, staff incorporated revised 4G LTE coverage data submitted by one mobile provider for South Carolina and Oklahoma. BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Cary Mitchell. Law & RegulationComments on A-CAM BDS Migration NPRM Due June 18On May 17, the FCC published in the Federal Register its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to allow rate-of- return carriers receiving universal service support under the Alternative Connect America Cost Model (A–CAM) to voluntarily migrate their lower speed circuit-based business data service (BDS) offerings to incentive regulation. Comments are due June 18 and reply comments are due July 2. As we reported in a previous edition of the BloostonLaw Telecom Update, the FCC is seeking comment on a regulatory framework that would provide electing A-CAM carriers a path to allow a move from rate-of-return regulation to a more efficient system of incentive regulation for their TDM transport and end user channel terminations at speeds at or below a DS3. First, the FCC proposes to allow electing A-CAM carriers to convert their lower capacity TDM BDS offerings to an incentive regulatory approach modelled on the rules the FCC adopted for price cap carriers’ lower speed BDS in noncompetitive areas, while still allowing such carriers to be subject to the switched access rate transition and the Eligible Recovery rules applicable to rate-of-return carriers. The FCC would allow conversion to incentive regulation for TDM transport and end user channel termination services offered at speeds at or below a DS3, as well as other generally lower speed non-packet-based services that are commonly considered special access services. As part of the conversion, the FCC contemplates relieving electing A-CAM carriers of a variety of regulatory obligations that pertain to rate-of-return regulation, including the obligation to perform cost studies. Electing A-CAM carriers would be allowed to offer term and volume discounts and contract-based services for their TDM transport and end user channel termination services offered at speeds at or below a DS3. Electing A-CAM carriers would be required to maintain generally available tariffed rates subject to incentive regulation for these lower speed TDM transport and end user channel terminations, and other special access services included in their tariffs. At the same time, electing A-CAM carriers would be allowed to remain in the NECA traffic-sensitive tariff for switched access services, and to continue to be subject to the switched access rate cap provisions of section 51.909 and the Eligible Recovery rules in section 51.917 of the FCC’s rules. Carriers that elect to move off rate-of-return regulation for their BDS services would be required to move to incentive regulation at the holding company level for study areas in all states that elected to receive A-CAM support rather than electing on an individual carrier or study area basis. Incentive regulation for electing A-CAM carriers would be effective on the July 1st following adoption of an Order. A-CAM carriers that currently file their own tariffed rates for BDS offerings would be permitted to use their existing rates to set their initial BDS rates under incentive regulation, while electing A-CAM carriers in the NECA pool would establish initial BDS rates by multiplying the NECA pool rate the carrier has been charging by a net contribution/recipient factor. The FCC also proposes to retain the special access basket, categories and subcategories, and the attendant rules governing the allowed annual adjustments. Each electing A-CAM carrier would initialize its PCI for the special access basket and associated service band indices (SBIs) at 100 and to use the rate adjustment rules for price cap carriers contained in sections 61.45-48 of our rules, as appropriate, to reflect the prescribed productivity factor, the inflation factor, and any required exogenous cost adjustment in the PCI, to ensure that the Actual Price Index (API) does not exceed the PCI, and that the SBIs for each category or subcategory do not exceed their upper limits. The FCC proposes to adopt an X-factor of two percent to reflect the productivity growth that electing A-CAM carriers are likely to experience in the provision of these services relative to productivity growth in the overall economy in the foreseeable future and to use Gross Domestic Product-Price Index (GDP-PI) as the measure of inflation that electing A-CAM carriers will use in their PCI calculations. The FCC also seeks comment on adopting a low-end adjustment mechanism to provide an appropriate backstop to ensure that electing A-CAM carriers are not subject to protracted periods of low earnings; forbearance from application of our cost assignment rules, including jurisdictional separations requirements; and allowing electing A-CAM carriers to use GAAP for keeping their accounts, should they choose to do so. BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens, Gerry Duffy, and Mary Sisak. IndustryPresident Trump Suggests Management Changes Instead of Sanctions for ZTEOn May 22, Reuters reported that President Trump proposed a plan to fine ZTE Corp and make changes to its management while rolling back more severe penalties. Trump’s proposal ran into immediate resistance in Congress, where Republicans and Democrats accused the president of bending to pressure from Beijing to ease up on a company that has admitted to violating sanctions on Iran. Speaking at the White House, Trump said U.S. technology companies have been hurt by an April Commerce Department decision that prohibits them from selling components to China’s second-largest telecommunications equipment maker. ZTE shut down most of its production after the ruling was announced. The FCC is also considering an item that would prohibit the use of USF funding to purchase from certain Chinese manufacturers that pose security risks, including ZTE. DeadlinesMAY 31: FCC FORM 395, EMPLOYMENT REPORT. Common carriers, including wireless carriers, with 16 or more full-time employees must file their annual Common Carrier Employment Reports (FCC Form 395) by May 31. This report tracks carrier compliance with rules requiring recruitment of minority employees. Further, the FCC requires all common carriers to report any employment discrimination complaints they received during the past year. That information is also due on May 31. The FCC encourages carriers to complete the discrimination report requirement by filling out Section V of Form 395, rather than submitting a separate report. BloostonLaw Contacts: Richard Rubino. MAY 31: FCC FORM 395, EMPLOYMENT REPORT. Common carriers, including wireless carriers, with 16 or more full-time employees must file their annual Common Carrier Employment Reports (FCC Form 395) by May 31. This report tracks carrier compliance with rules requiring recruitment of minority employees. Further, the FCC requires all common carriers to report any employment discrimination complaints they received during the past year. That information is also due on June 1. The FCC encourages carriers to complete the discrimination report requirement by filling out Section V of Form 395, rather than submitting a separate report. BloostonLaw Contacts: Richard Rubino. JULY 2: FCC FORM 481 (CARRIER ANNUAL REPORTING DATA COLLECTION FORM). All eligible telecommunications carriers (ETCs) must report the information required by Section 54.313, which includes outage, unfulfilled service request, and complaint data, broken out separately for voice and broadband services, information on the ETC’s holding company, operating companies, ETC affiliates and any branding in response to section 54.313(a)(8); its CAF-ICC certification, if applicable; its financial information, if a privately held rate-of-return carrier; and its satellite backhaul certification, if applicable. Form 481 must not only be filed with USAC, but also with the FCC and the relevant state commission and tribal authority, as appropriate. Although USAC treats the filing as confidential, filers must seek confidential treatment separately with the FCC and the relevant state commission and tribal authority if confidential treatment is desired. BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens, Gerry Duffy, and Sal Taillefer. JULY 2: MOBILITY FUND PHASE I ANNUAL REPORT. Winning bidders in Auction 901 that are authorized to receive Mobility Fund Phase I support are required to submit to the FCC an annual report each year on July 1 for the five years following authorization. Each annual report must be submitted to the Office of the Secretary of the FCC, clearly referencing WT Docket No. 10-208; the Universal Service Administrator; and the relevant state commissions, relevant authority in a U.S. Territory, or Tribal governments, as appropriate. The information and certifications required to be included in the annual report are described in Section 54.1009 of the FCC’s rules. BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Sal Taillefer. JULY 31: FCC FORM 507, UNIVERSAL SERVICE QUARTERLY LINE COUNT UPDATE . Line count updates are required to recalculate a carrier's per line universal service support, and is filed with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC). This information must be submitted on July 31 each year by all rate-of-return incumbent carriers, and on a quarterly basis if a competitive eligible telecommunications carrier (CETC) has initiated service in the rate-of-return incumbent carrier’s service area and reported line count data to USAC in the rate-of-return incumbent carrier’s service area, in order for the incumbent carrier to be eligible to receive Interstate Common Line Support (ICLS). This quarterly filing is due July 31 and covers lines served as of December 31 of the previous year. Incumbent carriers filing on a quarterly basis must also file on September 30 (for lines served as of March 31); December 30 (for lines served as of June 30, 2014), and March 31, for lines served as of September 30 of the previous year). BloostonLaw contacts: Ben Dickens, Gerry Duffy, and Mary Sisak. JULY 31: CARRIER IDENTIFICATION CODE (CIC) REPORTS. Carrier Identification Code (CIC) Reports must be filed by the last business day of July (this year, July 31). These reports are required of all carriers who have been assigned a CIC code by NANPA. Failure to file could result in an effort by NANPA to reclaim it, although according to the Guidelines this process is initiated with a letter from NANPA regarding the apparent non-use of the CIC code. The assignee can then respond with an explanation. (Guidelines Section 6.2). The CIC Reporting Requirement is included in the CIC Assignment Guidelines, produced by ATIS. According to section 1.4 of that document: At the direction of the NANPA, the access providers and the entities who are assigned CICs will be requested to provide access and usage information to the NANPA, on a semi-annual basis to ensure effective management of the CIC resource. (Holders of codes may respond to the request at their own election). Access provider and entity reports shall be submitted to NANPA no later than January 31 for the period ending December 31, and no later than July 31 for the period ending June 30. It is also referenced in the NANPA Technical Requirements Document, which states at 7.18.6: CIC holders shall provide a usage report to the NANPA per the industry CIC guidelines … The NAS shall be capable of accepting CIC usage reports per guideline requirements on January 31 for the period ending December 31 and no later than July 31 for the period ending June 30. These reports may also be mailed and accepted by the NANPA in paper form. Finally, according to the NANPA website, if no local exchange carrier reports access or usage for a given CIC, NANPA is obliged to reclaim it. The semi-annual utilization and access reporting mechanism is described at length in the guidelines. BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens and Gerry Duffy. Calendar At-a-Glance
May
June
July
August
|
Friends & Colleagues |
|
Iridium Recognized as Maritime Distress Services ProviderTuesday, May 22, 2018 The International Maritime Organization (IMO) Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) recognized that the Iridium Communications network meets the criteria needed to provide mobile satellite services in the Global Maritime Distress Safety System (GMDSS). The recognition makes Iridium the second recognized GMDSS provider; Inmarsat is the only other recognized GMDSS provider. The announcement ends a decades-long satellite industry monopoly in which only one company was authorized to provide satellite GMDSS service, and for the first time will bring competition and global coverage to mariners sailing any of the world’s oceans, Iridium said in a statement. The MSC also agreed that Iridium and the United States, the delegation sponsoring Iridium’s application at the IMO, will work with the International Mobile Satellite Organization (IMSO), which will monitor progress in Iridium’s implementation of the service. The IMSO will report to the MSC once a public services agreement is formalized between Iridium and the IMSO, likely marking the start of this service. “This is a historic moment for the maritime industry and an honor for Iridium to be the second ever recognized provider for GMDSS services,” said Bryan Hartin, executive vice president, Iridium. “This is the dawn of a new era for mariner safety. We’ll bring a new choice and upgraded capabilities for mariners along with our truly global coverage that will for the first time extend the reach of satellite-based GMDSS to even the most remote waterways.” Iridium formally began the process to become a recognized GMDSS mobile satellite service provide r in April 2013. Iridium plans to begin providing GMDSS service in early 2020. “This has been a long time coming, and we are ecstatic to gain this very important recognition from the IMO,” said Matt Desch, Iridium CEO. “We are equally proud to ensure mariners will have access to this critical system from anywhere in the world that they sail. Iridium has established itself as a trusted maritime safety provider for over a decade, and this recognition is a testament to both that trust and the capabilities offered by our satellite network.” Iridium is scheduled May 22 to launch its sixth Iridium NEXT mission with SpaceX, delivering five more Iridium NEXT satellites to low Earth orbit (LEO) as part of the continuing upgrade to its existing satellite network. The Iridium network is a constellation of 66 LEO cross-linked satellites that provide reliable, low-latency satellite communications to the entire world, including the poles. |
Source: | Radio Resource Media Group |
|
THOUGHT FOR THE WEEK |
More About I am Proud to be Bilingual U.S. citizens questioned by Border Patrol in Havre, Montana for speaking Spanish.
After last week's issue where I pointed out that there are over 50 million people in the United States who speak Spanish, and that I am proud to be one of them, I only received one response. It came from a really friendly guy who had misunderstood my comments. He asked, “Does this imply if somebody is not bilingual, they are xenophobic? Who are the ‘ignorant countrymen’ ?” And . . . “I do like your newsletter, and the often personal touch you add, but preferably without things like the xenophobia stuff. I get enough of that in the ‘press’ already.”
My answer was, “I wasn’t implying that anyone who isn’t bilingual is ignorant or xenophobic. The ignorant ones are like the guy in this news article:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/17/us/new-york-man-restaurant-ice-threat/index.html
This is the kind of behavior that I am ashamed of — from my “ignorant countrymen.” I met a nice a Hispanic guy once. He told me that people had frequently asked him when his family moved to the United States. His answer was that the United States moved and took over the land where his family had lived for many years — it is now Called New Mexico. Go figure. How about Puerto Ricans? They have been US citizens for over a hundred years, and they speak Spanish. |
VIDEO OF THE WEEK |
“Listen to the Music”
|
Source: | YouTube | To learn more about the work of the PFC Foundation, visit http://www.playingforchange.org |
![]() |
Home Page | Directory | Consulting | Newsletters | Free Subscription | Products | Reference | Glossary | Send e-mail |