newsletter logo

Wireless News Aggregation

Friday — January 31, 2020 — Issue No. 893

Welcome Back To

The Wireless Messaging News


AT&T slashed billions from network spending, cut tens of thousands of jobs

Despite government favors, AT&T capital spending and employment keep declining.

JON BRODKIN - 1/30/2020, 2:55 PM


An AT&T sign outside a company office in New York City.

AT&T slashed capital expenditures by more than $1.6 billion in 2019 and projects a capital-investment cut of more than $3 billion in 2020.

AT&T's capital expenditures for the full year of 2019 totaled $19.64 billion, down from $21.25 billion in 2018, an AT&T investor briefing released yesterday said.

The broadband industry and Federal Communications Commission officials have used capital expenditures as a measure of broadband-network investment and have claimed that eliminating net neutrality rules and other regulations would cause such investment to rise. But some of the biggest ISPs, such as Comcast and Charter, have been reducing capital expenditures despite getting their sought-after net neutrality repeal and a large corporate tax cut.

As we reported in October, AT&T has been warning of a $3 billion cut in capital investment to come in 2020, which would reduce the amount it spends on upgrading and expanding wireline and mobile broadband networks. The company reiterated that guidance and discussed its plans in its earnings report yesterday.

The planned cut is based on a slightly different measure that AT&T calls "gross capital investment," which includes the $19.64 billion in capital expenditures plus "cash payments for vendor financing" and spending on FirstNet, a public-safety network AT&T is building with a government contract. AT&T said that this vendor financing is generally excluded from capital expenditures and reported separately as financing activities, but AT&T has started reporting its capital-spending numbers both with and without the long-term financing.

AT&T said its gross capital investment in 2019 was $23.7 billion, which AT&T said meets its goal of spending in the "$23-billion range."

In 2020, AT&T said its goal is much lower, with gross capital investment somewhere in the "$20-billion range," likely resulting in a cut of more than $3 billion. Vendor-financing payments are expected to make up about $3 billion of that $20 billion.

In an earnings call yesterday, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson said the "board has developed a very thoughtful capital allocation approach that will maintain a solid balance sheet and drive shareholder value."

Despite tax break, another 20,000 job cuts

In addition to the drops in capital spending, AT&T continues cutting jobs despite Stephenson previously claiming that AT&T would use a corporate tax break to create "7,000 hard-hat jobs." As we noted in a story yesterday, AT&T had 247,800 employees at the end of 2019, down from 268,220 one year earlier. That's a 7.6 percent drop in employment.

The new earnings report "shows that AT&T continues to cut jobs and reduce capital expenditures even as the company announced record operating and free cash flow for 2019 and more than $5 billion in stock buybacks in the past four months," the Communications Workers of America (CWA) union said in a statement. "The company has cut 37,818 jobs since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) went into effect in 2018, including 4,040 in the fourth quarter of 2019."

AT&T notified the union last week "of its plans to cut an additional 200 technician positions in California on February 14, 2020," the CWA said.

Verizon reported earnings today, saying that its capital expenditures rose from $16.7 billion in 2018 to $17.9 billion in 2019. Verizon said its capital spending in 2020 will be "in the range of $17 billion to $18 billion." Verizon's number of employees dropped from 144,500 at the end of 2018 to 135,000 at the end of 2019.

[source]


Wireless Messaging News

  • Emergency Radio Communications
  • Wireless Messaging
  • Critical Messaging
  • Two-way Radio
  • Technology
  • Telemetry
  • Science
  • Paging
  • Wi-Fi
Wireless
wireless logo medium
Messaging

NO POLITICS HERE

This doesn't mean that nothing is ever published here that mentions a US political party—it just means that the editorial policy of this newsletter is to remain neutral on all political issues. We don't take sides.


About Us

A new issue of the Wireless Messaging Newsletter is posted on the web each week. A notification goes out by e-mail to subscribers on most Fridays around noon central US time. The notification message has a link to the actual newsletter on the web. That way it doesn’t fill up your incoming e-mail account.

There is no charge for subscription and there are no membership restrictions. Readers are a very select group of wireless industry professionals, and include the senior managers of many of the world’s major Paging and Wireless Messaging companies. There is an even mix of operations managers, marketing people, and engineers — so I try to include items of interest to all three groups. It’s all about staying up-to-date with business trends and technology.

I regularly get readers’ comments, so this newsletter has become a community forum for the Paging, and Wireless Messaging communities. You are welcome to contribute your ideas and opinions. Unless otherwise requested, all correspondence addressed to me is subject to publication in the newsletter and on my web site. I am very careful to protect the anonymity of those who request it.

I spend the whole week searching the Internet for news that I think may be of interest to you — so you won’t have to. This newsletter is an aggregator — a service that aggregates news from other news sources. You can help our community by sharing any interesting news that you find.


Editorial Policy

Editorial Opinion pieces present only the opinions of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any of advertisers or supporters. This newsletter is independent of any trade association. I don't intend to hurt anyone's feelings, but I do freely express my own opinions.


We need your help. This is the only remaining news source dedicated to information about Paging and Wireless Messaging.

animated left arrow

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This section left empty intentionally.



Subscribe Here

IT'S FREE

* required field

If you would like to subscribe to the newsletter just fill in the blanks in the form above, and then click on the “Subscribe” bar.


Advertiser Index

IWA Technical Services, Inc.  (Ira Wiesenfeld)
Leavitt Communications  (Phil Leavitt)
Media 1
Prism Paging  (Jim Nelson & John Bishop)
Paging & Wireless Network Planners LLC  (Ron Mercer)
Wex International Limited

Service Monitors and Frequency Standards for Sale


Motorola Service Monitor

IFR Service Monitor

Efratom Rubidium Standard

(Images are typical units, not actual photos of items offered for sale here.)

Qty Item Notes
2 Late IFR 500As with new batteries
1 Motorola R 2001D  
4 Motorola R 2400 and 2410A  
5 Motorola R 2600 and R 2660 late S/Ns  
4 Motorola R 1200  
2 Motorola R 2200  
2 Stand-alone Efratom Rubidium Frequency Standards 10 MHz output
1 Telawave model 44 wattmeter Recently calibrated
1 IFR 1000S  
All sold with 7 day ROR (Right of Refusal), recent calibration, operation manual and accessories  
Factory carrying cases for each with calibration certificate  
Many parts and accessories  

Frank Moorman

fircls54@aol.com animated left arrow

(254) 596-1124


Leavitt Communications

leavitt

Specialists in sales and service of equipment from these leading manufacturers, as well as other two-way radio and paging products:

bendix king COM

motorola blue Motorola SOLUTIONS

   
UNICATION

WE ARE STILL STOCKING AND SELLING THE UNICATION ELEGANT PAGERS

Contact us for price and availability please

Philip C. Leavitt
Manager
Leavitt Communications
7508 N. Red Ledge Drive
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253
CONTACT INFORMATION
E-mail: pcleavitt@leavittcom.com
Web Site: www.leavittcom.com
Mobile phone: 847-494-0000
Telephone: 847-955-0511
Fax: 270-447-1909
Skype ID: pcleavitt

WEX INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

Hong Kong
ONE SOURCE FOR ALL YOUR REQUIREMENTS OF PAGERS
FOR IN-HOUSE AND WIDE AREA NETWORK PAGING

POCSAG ALPHANUMERIC PAGERS TO SUIT EVERY REQUIREMENT

W8001 (4 Line/8 Line IP67 Alphanumeric Pager)

W8008 Thinnest IP67 Rated Alphanumeric Pager 4 Line/8 Line, OLED Display

W2028 (2 Line/4 Line Alphanumeric Pager)

For Trade inquiries contact:
Eric Dilip Kumar
eric@wex.com.hk

  • Available in VHF, UHF & 900 MHz Full Range Frequency Bands
  • We are OEM for Major Brand names in USA and Europe
  • We also Design and Manufacture POCSAG Decoder Boards
  • We can Design and Manufacture to customer specifications
  • Factory located in Shenzhen, China
  • Pagers have FCC, RoHs, C-Tick, CE-EMC, IC Approvals

Visit our websites for more details www.wex.com.hk

For ESPAÑOL, PORTUGUÊS AND DEUTSCH versions, please go to:
www.pagermaker.com


Paging Transmitters 150/900 MHz

The RFI High Performance Paging Transmitter is designed for use in campus, city, state and country-wide paging systems. Designed for use where reliable simulcast systems where RF signal overlap coverage is critical.

  • Commercial Paging systems.
  • Healthcare Paging systems.
  • Public Safety Emergency Services Paging systems.
  • Demand Response Energy Grid Management.

Built-in custom interface for Prism-IPX ipBSC Base Controller for remote control, management and alarm reporting.

  • Use as a stand-alone unit or in wide area network.
  • Mix with other transmitter brands in an existing paging network.
  • Adjustable from 20-250 watts.
  • 110/240 VAC or 48VDC.
  • Absolute Delay Correction.
  • Remote Diagnostics.
  • Configurable alarm thresholds.
  • Integrated Isolator.
  • Superb Reliability.
  • Improved amplifier efficiency.
  • Most reliable high-powered paging transmitter available.

Prism-IPX Systems LLC.


11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ph: 678-242-5290 Email: sales@prism-ipx.com
prism-ipx.com


  • LIVE response possible to any program with Media 1 Live app from Android or Apple stores, summed up immediately for producer on web site media1live.com
  • Propose LIVE broadcast on Internet with live response to reach youth with low cost quality education, seeking persons interested.
  • Contact: ewtexas@att.net

IMPORTANT

“Is Paging Going Away?” by Jim Nelson

  • Click here for English.
  • Click here for German. (Berlin Revision: November 8, 2016)
  • Click here for French.

Here is an English PDF edit of this paper formatted with page breaks and suitable for printing.

Volunteers needed for translations into other languages.


 


Board of Advisors

The Wireless Messaging News
Board of Advisors

Frank McNeill
Founder & CEO
Communications Specialists
Jim Nelson
President & CEO
Prism Systems International
Kevin D. McFarland, MSCIS
Sr. Application Systems Analyst
Dartmouth-Hitchcock
Medical Center
Paul Lauttamus, President
Lauttamus Communications & Security
R.H. (Ron) Mercer
Wireless Consultant
Barry Kanne
Paging Industry Veteran
Ira Wiesenfeld, P.E.
Consulting Engineer
Allan Angus
Consulting Engineer

The Board of Advisor members are people with whom I have developed a special rapport, and have met personally. They are not obligated to support the newsletter in any way, except with advice, and maybe an occasional letter to the editor.


CAN YOU HELP?

Can You Help The Newsletter?

animated left arrow

You can help support The Wireless Messaging News by clicking on the PayPal Donate button above. It is not necessary to be a member of PayPal to use this service.


Reader Support

Newspapers generally cost 75¢ $1.50 a copy and they hardly ever mention paging or wireless messaging, unless in a negative way. If you receive some benefit from this publication maybe you would like to help support it financially?

A donation of $50.00 would certainly help cover a one-year period. If you are wiling and able, please click on the PayPal Donate button above.


Apple is officially done rebuilding its maps in the US

The next step? Remapping Europe.
By Chris Velazco
January 30, 2020


Chris Velazco/Engadget

To say Apple Maps stumbled out of the gate is putting it mildly; it quickly became an Internet punchline when it launched in 2012, and left the company with the unenviable job of fixing it. Since then, Apple has been rebuilding the most fundamental part of the experience — the base maps themselves — and today the company says it's finally done. Well, in the United States, anyway.

Getting to this point was no small feat. It's been nearly a year and a half since Apple announced its plans, but even before that, a fleet of LIDAR-equipped vans was criss-crossing the United States to capture as much detailed location data as possible. To gather even more geographical context, Apple also captured map data from the air, though it's not clear how many planes the company employed for this work. While Apple wouldn't confirm any increases in budget or staff to make all of this possible, the company's investment in the project seems significant, and there's still more to come. The big push to re-map the United States is now officially done, but Apple has earmarked some of its LIDAR vans for maintenance runs — that is, they'll continue to roam on roads to make sure that hard-won data remains up to date.

The end result is a more accurate set of maps that you might have already been looking at — the company has been pushing them live around the country for at least the past six months. There are a few telltale signs to look out for if you're not sure: Coastlines are more accurately represented, as are buildings like airports and malls. When we reviewed iOS 13, we also noticed more nuanced street-level data; there were more street labels on-screen compared to Google Maps, and more streets had traffic direction indicators. That might not sound like a big deal, but it's really helpful when trying to orient yourself when you're emerging from the subway.

So, yes, your maps might look a little better at a glance. Ultimately, though, the real value of Apple's work here is that it has direct control over all of that map data. Let's say corrections or additions (like new roads) need to be made. Unlike in years past, when it had to petition a third-party data provider to make a fix that could take months to complete anyway, Apple can go in and make the changes itself. The general turn-around time? Just a few days. With all that said, Apple isn't completely going it alone in Maps. The underlying location data is 100% Apple, but it still works with partners to fold in data for transit schedules and other things.

It's worth noting that the new maps are pretty broadly accessible, too. You'll get the most out of them if in iOS 13, which leans on the improved location data for faster navigation and search results. iOS 13 also packs Look Around, Apple's Street View rival, though it unfortunately still only works in a handful of cities. Still, the base maps themselves should be available to most people currently using iOS, so even those who aren't using the latest software should notice a difference.

Whether Apple Maps is worth embracing over Google Maps is still a matter of opinion, though it's fair to say the latter still packs functionality that Apple struggles with. (Apple Maps' support for transit directions, for example, is pretty lacking.) Despite that, this new Maps experience is a clear step forward — we'll just have to see if people decide to give it a chance.

Source: engadget  

Prism-IPX Systems

prism-ipx systems

prism-ipx systems
prism-ipx systems

 

prism-ipx systems


 


Click on the image above for more info about advertising here.


Internet Protocol Terminal

The IPT accepts Internet or serial messaging using various protocols and can easily convert them to different protocols, or send them out as paging messages.

An ideal platform for hospitals, on-site paging applications, or converting legacy systems to modern protocols.

Input Protocols: Serial and IP
TAP TNPP SNPP
HTTP WCTP SMTP
POTS (DTMF) DID (DTMF)  
 
Output Protocols: Serial and IP
TAP TNPP SNPP
HTTP HTTPS SMPP
WCTP WCTPS SMTP
FLEX (optional PURC control)   POCSAG (optional PURC control)

Additional/Optional Features

  • Database of up to 5000 subscribers.
  • 4 serial ports on board.
  • Up to 8 phone lines (DID or POTS).
  • Can be configured for auto-fail-over to hot swap standby.
  • 1RU rack mount unit appliance—no moving parts.
  • Easily secure legacy system messages leaving site for HIPAA compliance.
  • Only purchase the protocols/options you need.
  • Add Paging Encryption for HIPAA compliance on site.

Prism-IPX Systems LLC.


11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ph: 678-242-5290 e-mail: sales@prism-ipx.com
prism-ipx.com


Paging Data Receiver PDR-4

The PDR-4 is a multi-function paging data receiver that decodes paging messages and outputs them via the serial port, USB or Ethernet connectors.

Designed for use with Prism-IPX ECHO software Message Logging Software to receive messages and log the information for proof of transmission over the air, and if the data was error free.

  • Option—decode capcode list or all messages.
  • Large capcode capacity.
  • Serial, USB and Ethernet output.
  • POCSAG or FLEX page decoding, special SA protocols.
  • Receivers for paging bands in VHF, UHF, 900 MHz.
  • Message activated Alarm Output.
  • 8 programmable relay outputs.
  • Send notifications of a system problem.
  • Synthesized Receiver Tuning.
  • Selectivity better than 60 dB.
  • Frequencies 148-174, 450-470, 929-932 MHz.
  • Image Rejection better than 55 dB.
  • Spurious Rejection better than 55 dB.
  • Channel Spacing 12.5 or 25 kHz.
  • Power 5VDC.
  • Receiving Sensitivity 5µV at 1200 bps.

Prism-IPX Systems LLC.


11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ph: 678-242-5290 e-mail: sales@prism-ipx.com
prism-ipx.com


Wireless Network Planners

Wireless Network Planners
Wireless Specialists

R.H. (Ron) Mercer
Consultant
217 First Street
East Northport, NY 11731

ron mercer
Telephone: 631-786-9359
www.wirelessplanners.com left arrow
wirelessplannerron@gmail.com left arrow

Microsoft finally fixes broken File Explorer on Windows 10

By Mayank Parmar — January 29, 2020

Windows 10’s November 2019 Update, also known as version 1909, is a service pack like-update with fixes and improvements, but even the November 2019 Update isn’t perfect for many consumers.

Many people are seeing annoying problems with File Explorer’s search box after deploying Windows 10 November 2019 Update. Microsoft said that November Update includes a new feature that adds online results from services like OneDrive to File Explorer’s search box, and it also enables suggestions in the search box.

Our findings revealed that Microsoft broke the File Explorer when integrating its new search experience. After delaying the patch for almost two months, Microsoft has finally shipped Windows 10 KB4532695 with fix for all your File Explorer and Control Panel issues.

In the changelog, Microsoft noted that January 28 update addresses an issue that prevents File Explorer’s search bar from receiving user input. Another bug has been resolved that prevented everyone from pasting copied text into the search bar with mouse’s right-click.

Microsoft’s Windows Insider team were aware of File Explorer problems and they fixed it in beta Build 19013, which was released on October 29, but Microsoft officially shipped November 2019 Update with this bug on November 12, apparently creating another mess.

Windows 10 update with File Explorer fix is currently rolling out to seekers or those who manually check for updates and select ‘Download and install now’ option. If you don’t want to install this particular update, you can fix your File Explorer issues with February Patch Tuesday release.

Current status of November 2019 Update

Windows 10 November 2019 Update is deliberately low-key with a limited set of improvements rather than a boatload of new features. Some people have described this release as a service pack with small and subtle changes.

Microsoft is expected to release another November 2019 Update-like service pack codenamed ’20H2′ later this year.

Source: Windows Latest  


Consulting Alliance

Brad Dye, Ron Mercer, Allan Angus, Vic Jackson, and Ira Wiesenfeld are friends and colleagues who work both together and independently, on wireline and wireless communications projects.

Click here left arrow for a summary of their qualifications and experience. Each one has unique abilities. We would be happy to help you with a project, and maybe save you some time and money.

Note: We do not like Patent Trolls, i.e. “a person or company who enforces patent rights against accused infringers in an attempt to collect licensing fees, but does not manufacture products or supply services based upon the patents in question.” We have helped some prominent law firms defend their clients against this annoyance, and would be happy to do some more of this same kind of work.

Some people use the title “consultant” when they don't have a real job. We actually do consulting work, and help others based on our many years of experience.


“If you would know the road ahead, ask someone who has traveled it.”
— Chinese Proverb


Consulting Alliance

Remote AB Switches

ABX-1 switches are often used at remote transmitter sites to convert from old, outdated and unsupported controllers to the new modern Prism-IPX ipBSC base station controllers. Remotely switch to new controllers with GUI commands.

ABX-1

ABX-3 switches are widely used for enabling or disabling remote equipment and switching I/O connections between redundant messaging systems.

ABX-3

Common Features:

  • RJ45 for A, B and Common connectors.
  • Manual push button or use Prism IP commands to switch one or more relays.
  • Single or Dual Port Control card for IP or Serial connection.
  • Form C relay—control local connection.
  • Power Loss Indicator.
  • Rear Panel Connector for controlling the switch externally.
  • Power Source: 5VDC for ABX-1; 12VDC for ABX-3.

Prism-IPX Systems LLC.


11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ph: 678-242-5290 e-mail: sales@prism-ipx.com
prism-ipx.com


Kuo: Apple to Launch AirTags, Small Charging Mat, New iPads and Macs, High-End Headphones, and More in First Half of 2020

Wednesday January 29, 2020 8:12 am PST by Joe Rossignol

Apple plans to release several new products in the first half of 2020, including Ultra Wideband tags, high-end wireless headphones, a 4.7-inch iPhone, refreshed iPad Pro models, and refreshed MacBook Pro and/or MacBook Air models, according to the latest forecast from well-known Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo.


MacRumors uncovered evidence of a hidden "Items" tab in iOS 13 for "AirTags"

"We forecast that Apple's major new hardware products in 1H20 include the 4.7-inch LCD iPhone, iPad Pro, MacBook Pro/Air, smaller wireless charging mat, UWB tag, and a high-end Bluetooth headphone," wrote Kuo in a research note with TF International Securities, a copy of which was seen by MacRumors.

Our insight on these products:

Farther out, Kuo said the worst scenario for Apple related to the new coronavirus outbreak would be postponing the qualification and mass production schedules for new products in the second half of the year.

"If there are no significant improvements regarding the coronavirus epidemic in the foreseeable future, we predict that Apple may delay new material adoptions or lower test requirements for components to shorten qualification processes and launch new products in 2H20 on schedule, and the lower spec will likely hurt the ASP of materials or components," wrote Kuo.

Source: MacRumors  

Leavitt Communications

We can supply alphanumeric display, numeric display, and voice pagers.

We also offer NEW and refurbished Alphamate 250s, refurbished Alphamate IIs, the original Alphamate refurbished, and new and refurbished pagers, pager repairs, pager parts, and accessories. We are FULL SERVICE in Paging! Outstanding service is our goal.

E-mail Phil Leavitt ( pcleavitt@leavittcom.com ) for pricing and delivery information, or for a list of other available paging and two-way related equipment.

Phil Leavitt
847-955-0511
pcleavitt@leavittcom.com

LEAVITT COMMUNICATIONS
7508 N. Red Ledge Drive
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253
www.leavittcom.com


Friday, January 31, 2020 Volume 8 | Issue 20

Commissioners Spar as FCC Votes on Rural Broadband Subsidies

By Leslie Stimson, Inside Towers Washington Bureau Chief

The FCC Thursday voted on final rules to create the $20.4 billion Rural Digital Opportunity Fund, subsidies that Chairman Ajit Pai announced last year at the White House. Through a two-phase reverse auction mechanism, the agency will direct up to $20.4 billion over 10 years to finance up to gigabit speed broadband networks in unserved rural areas. The vote was contentious, with Democrats opposing parts of the plan, saying it leaves out at least one state and relies on bad broadband maps.

Commissioner Brendan Carr praised the item’s attention on those who need broadband most. “I proposed we focused first on communities that have either dial-up or nothing.”

Carr praised changes to Letters of Credit carriers need from lending institutions to qualify for the money. Before the change, the letters represented “over $600 million more than necessary” to be spent on fees, “which would have decreased [the] chances of building out. So, rather than tying up scarce dollars, we have more capital to go directly into the ground, building Internet infrastructure,” Carr explained.

Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel blasted the reliance on the FCC’s outdated broadband maps to determine which areas are eligible for the funding. She referenced a woman in upstate New York who led residents to survey broadband availability in their town to, “prove to local, state and federal authorities that they do not have the infrastructure they need to succeed in the digital age. Let’s salute them for their grit, savvy and persistence. But it shouldn’t have to be this way.”

Rosenworcel said stridently: “The FCC should know where service truly is and is not. We need maps before money and accurate data before deployment.” She said major changes were made to the order the night before the vote, “without understanding” the ramifications. The item, Rosenworcel said, “was guided by the desire to rush” the order “out the door, claim credit and declare our broadband problems solved.” Rosenworcel also took issue with the FCC’s recent decision to leave New York out of Phase 1 of the fund, because of previously established programs to fund rural broadband in that state. Before the vote, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) wrote to Chairman Pai in protest, Inside Towers reported. Commissioner Michael O’Rielly said: “I applaud the Chairman for refusing to cave to demands of certain self-serving politicians to use our funds to overbuild. To claim that New York is being short-changed is ludicrous.”

Chairman Pai said during the vote the need is urgent: “I cannot condone spending funds on areas that already have broadband.” As for the agency’s maps, he said: “Last August, the FCC adopted the digital opportunity data collection, a new look at brand mapping to collect granular price and crowd source data so we can target support to those in partially served areas in Phase II of the fund.”

The Commission recognizes that based on new broadband availability information, changes may need to be made for Phase II of the fund, Pai explained. “But none of these questions [of] who is in Phase Two, or how much it will cost to serve them, undercuts our obligation to ensure millions we know are unserved have something. I do not stand for delaying digital opportunity for millions of Americans any longer. I can’t wait to see the auction begin later this year.”

Pai read aloud the names of several organizations that support the fund, including the National Association of Tower Erectors. (Read more about that and reaction from other telecom associations here.)

The first phase of the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund will begin later this year and target census blocks that are wholly unserved with fixed broadband at speeds of at least 25/3 Mbps. Phase 1 would make available up to $16 billion to census blocks where existing data shows there is no such service. The Rural Digital Opportunity Fund auction will prioritize networks with higher speeds, greater usage allowances, and lower latency. To support the deployment of sustainable networks in this auction, the auction will prioritize bidders committing to provide fast service with low latency.

Source: Inside Towers newsletter Courtesy of the editor of Inside Towers Jim Fryer.
Inside Towers is a daily newsletter by subscription.

BloostonLaw Newsletter

Selected portions [sometimes more — sometimes less — sometimes the whole updates] of the BloostonLaw Telecom Update and/or the BloostonLaw Private Users Update — newsletters from the Law Offices of Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens, Duffy & Prendergast, LLP — are reproduced in this section of The Wireless Messaging News with kind permission from the firm. The firm's contact information is included at the end of this section of the newsletter.


 BloostonLaw Telecom Update Vol. 23, No. 5 January 29, 2020 

FCC Adopts Uniform Deployment and Reporting Deadlines for CAF Phase II Auction Support

On January 27, the FCC issued an Order establishing uniform deadlines for all recipients of CAF Phase II auction funding. Service milestone deadlines for all CAF Phase II auction support recipients will fall at the end of the calendar year, and annual location filing and certification deadlines will fall on March 1 of the years following the milestone deadlines.

See the full article below for more information.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens and Sal Taillefer.

Headlines


FCC Reestablishes Deployment and Reporting Deadlines for CAF Phase II Auction Support

On January 27, the FCC issued an Order establishing uniform deadlines for all recipients of CAF Phase II auction funding. Service milestone deadlines for all CAF Phase II auction support recipients will fall at the end of the calendar year, and annual location filing and certification deadlines will fall on March 1 following milestone deadlines.

Previously under the Commission’s rules, certain deadlines applicable to CAF Phase II auction support recipients were based on the start of the funding year (i.e., when support payments to the recipients commenced). For example, a carrier receiving CAF Phase II auction support is required to complete construction and commercially offer service to 40% of its required locations in a state by the end of the third twelve-month period of funding authorization, an additional 20% in each subsequent year, and 100% by the end of the sixth year. Now, the service milestones for all CAF Phase II auction support recipients will be as follows:

Percentage of Locations in a State Service Milestone Deadline
40 December 31, 2022
60 December 31, 2023
80 December 31, 2024
100 December 31, 2025

Given the changes to the service milestone deadlines, the FCC also modified the deadline for auction support recipients to annually report location information with USAC through the High-Cost Universal Broadband (HUBB) portal, and to certify that they have met their interim service milestones and are meeting the requisite public interest obligations.

Previously, such filings were due “by the last business day of the second calendar month following each relevant service.” Now, they are due March 1 following each service milestone, as is already the case for CAF Phase II model-based support, as well as rate-of-return carriers receiving both A-CAM and legacy support. According to the FCC, the varied deadlines established as a result of rolling authorizations may create confusion amongst some support recipients as to the appropriate applicable deadlines.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens, Mary Sisak, and Sal Taillefer.

FCC Approves SAS Administrators; Authorizes Full Commercial Deployment of 3.5 GHz CBRS

On Monday, the FCC certified four Spectrum Access System (SAS) Administrators, paving the way for full commercial operations and 5G wireless services in the 3.55-3.7 GHz band. This is significant, because the SAS serves as an automated “frequency coordinator” to manage spectrum sharing among three tiers of spectrum users in the CBRS band. SAS certification also paves the way for the auction of Priority Access Licenses (Auction 105) that is scheduled to begin on June 25, 2020.

"[W]e certify that the SASs of CommScope, Federated, Google, and Sony comply with our rules, and we approve each SAS for commercial operation subject to ongoing compliance with the Commission’s rules," the FCC said.

Prior to commercial availability, the 3.5 GHz CBRS band was used primarily by the Department of Defense (DoD), mostly for shipborne radar systems. To ensure that the DoD has continued access to the band, Environmental Sensing Capability (ESC) networks have been deployed along the U.S. coast. The ESC networks operated by CommScope, Federated Wireless, and Google inform the SAS administrators to activate a protection zone and dynamically reassign users in the area to other parts of the band, thus protecting DoD’s use of the spectrum while maximizing availability of CBRS spectrum across coastal areas.

A press release issued by the CBRS Alliance offered some additional detail about the CBRS full commercial deployment news. The CBRS Alliance focuses on the development of 4G and 5G technology for use in the CBRS band. The Alliance also is responsible for the OnGo brand used for CBRS offerings.

The CBRS Alliance estimates that the CBRS band will directly contribute as much as $15.6 billion to the U.S. economy, and that its actual value to consumers could be as much as $80-260 billion. The OnGo ecosystem is vast and opens a brand-new market for wireless communications and 5G services in the United States, touching rural broadband via fixed wireless providers (WISPs), enterprise IT, hospitality, retail, real estate, industrial IoT, and transportation, among other sectors. OnGo-compatible mobile devices that are on the market today include the Google Pixel 4, Motorola’s 5G Moto Mod, Samsung Galaxy S10, Apple iPhone 11, LG G8 ThinQ, and OnePlus 7 Pro.

As part of its announcement, the FCC reminded 3650-3700 MHz Service licensees that their Part 90 operations will not be entitled to interference protection from CBRS operations beyond their current license term, and it encouraged them to contact SAS Administrators to discuss options for integrating their operations into CBRS. As it stands, April 17, 2020 is the deadline for most 3650-3700 MHz Service licensees to comply with the new Part 96 CBRS rules. The FCC has yet to rule on pending requests to extend the April 17, 2020 deadline, including a blanket request for waiver filed jointly by the Wireless Internet Service Providers Association (“WISPA”) and the United Technology Council (“UTC”).

Clients that operate 3650-3700 MHz Service networks and that anticipate the need for additional time to upgrade their 3.5 GHz networks to meet Part 96 requirements should contact Cary Mitchell ASAP to discuss their options.

BloostonLaw Contact: Cary Michell.

Comments on Technical Requirements for Reassigned Numbers Database Due February 24

On January 24, the FCC issued a Public Notice seeking comment on the Technical Requirements Document for the Reassigned Numbers Database (Database) recently approved by the North American Numbering Council (NANC). Comments are due February 24, and reply comments are due March 9.

As we reported in a previous edition of the BloostonLaw Telecom Update, the FCC adopted a Second Report and Order at the end of 2018 in which it established a single, comprehensive database that will contain reassigned number information from each provider that obtains North American Numbering Plan U.S. geographic numbers and toll-free numbers. The purpose of the Database is to enable a caller to determine whether a telephone number has been reassigned and thus avoid calling consumers with reassigned numbers who may not wish to receive their call.

To establish the Database, the Commission directed the NANC, the Commission’s federal advisory committee on numbering issues, to develop a Technical Requirements Document for the Database for review by the Commission. The NANC approved its recommended Technical Requirements Document at its January 13, 2020.

A copy of the Technical Requirements Document can be found here.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Mary Sisak and Sal Taillefer.

FCC Issues Compliance Advisory on Lifeline Usage Rule

On January 28, the FCC’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued an advisory letter regarding carrier failures to comply with the program’s usage rule. The usage rule states that ETCs shall only receive universal service support reimbursement for Lifeline service provided to subscribers who have used the service within the last 30 days, or who have cured their non-usage in accordance with the Commission’s rules.

The OIG indicated that it has discovered evidence that some ETCs regularly sought and received Lifeline subsidies for accounts with no qualifying usage within the time frame required by the rule (historically, a 30- or 60-day period). OIG also has evidence ETCs have sought reimbursement for providing service to accounts that never had any qualifying usage. Other examples of usage rule violations include treating the following as qualifying usage:

  • Incoming texts to subscribers
  • Incoming voicemails to subscribers
  • Data use not generated by the subscriber

The OIG therefore reminds ETCs to carefully scrutinize their usage monitoring and de-enrollment practices to ensure compliance with program rules. If ETCs discover usage problems, OIG reminds carriers of their obligation to take appropriate remedial measures, including amending past 497 filings and de-enrolling affected subscribers. The OIG stated that ETCs who defraud the USF by violating the program’s usage rule will be held accountable and may be subject to civil or criminal sanctions.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Mary Sisak and Sal Taillefer.

Law and Regulation


FCC Eliminates Amortization Requirement for E-Rate

On January 27, the FCC issued a Report and Order formally eliminating the E-Rate requirement to amortize over three years upfront, non-recurring charges of $500,000 or more, including charges for special construction projects. In eliminating the requirement, the FCC found that it increased costs for E-Rate supported builds and created uncertainty for applicants about the availability of E-Rate funding for the second and third years of the amortization cycle.

Originally adopted in 2000, the amortization requirement was meant to address a concern that large upfront charges for non-recurring services—which are often charges for the construction of new or upgraded network infrastructure—could drain available E-Rate funding by diverting large sums to a limited number of applicants. In 2014, the Commission suspended the amortization requirement for funding year 2015 through funding year 2018, finding that the suspension would lower barriers to infrastructure investment, including fiber deployment, by allowing applicants to plan large construction projects with the knowledge that they (or their service provider) could recover the discounted portion of the non-recurring charges upfront instead of over a period of three years. In 2019, the FCC tentatively concluded that suspending the amortization requirement had encouraged the deployment of high-speed, low cost broadband networks by eliminating administrative barriers and making E-Rate funding more predictable.

The formal elimination of the amortization requirement will be effective 30 days after the Report and Order is published in the Federal Register, but the suspension of that requirement originally implemented in 2014 will continue until the effective date.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Gerry Duffy and Sal Taillefer.

FCC Issues $16,000 Penalty for Unlicensed Operation in 3650-3700 MHz Band

On January 22, the FCC issued an Order assessing a $16,000 civil penalty against Brevard Wireless, Inc. dba Florida High Speed Internet (Brevard) for unauthorized operation in the 3650-3700 MHz band. In addition to the penalty, Brevard is required to implement a compliance plan.

In February of 2019, the Commission received a complaint of harmful interference to a licensed Fixed Satellite Service Earth Station near Jacksonville, Florida, affecting the reception of satellite downlink transmissions in the 3700-4200 MHz band (3.7 GHz Band). Using direction-finding techniques, an FCC agent determined that the source of the interference was a transmission by a Brevard base station transmitting in both the 3.6 and 3.7 GHz Bands from antenna structure 1016457, near Jacksonville, Florida (Jacksonville Location).

The agent also determined that Brevard was operating other base stations in the 3.6 GHz Band from antenna structure 1032488 near Saint Augustine, Florida (Saint Augustine Location). The agent contacted Brevard, which agreed to shut down these devices and confirmed with the complainant that the interference subsequently ceased. The agent then consulted the Commission’s records and confirmed that Brevard had not registered to operate at or near the Jacksonville or Saint Augustine Locations. Brevard admitted that it had operated base stations without authorization at the Jacksonville and Saint Augustine Locations and stated that it had turned off the base stations operating in the 3.6 and 3.7 GHz bands at those locations and subsequently registered the Jacksonville and Saint Augustine Locations for 3.6 GHz band operations.

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Cary Mitchell.

President Trump Signs PIRATE Act into Law

On January 24, President Trump signed the Preventing Illegal Radio Abuse Through Enforcement Act (PIRATE) Act into law. The PIRATE Act, which was reintroduced by Reps. Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.) and Gus Bilirakis (R-FL) in early 2019, gives the FCC authority to levy fines of up to $100,000 per violation and $2 million in total. It also streamlines the enforcement process; requires the FCC to conduct mandatory pirate radio enforcement sweeps in cities with the highest concentration of pirate radio use; and seeks to ensure more coordination among federal, state and local law enforcement.

In a statement, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said: “Pirate radio is unlawful, period. These transmissions can interfere with licensed radio signals—including broadcasters’ sharing of vital public safety information with their communities. To enforce the law and protect American radio listeners and lawful businesses, the FCC has made a concerted effort in recent years to step up our enforcement efforts against pirate radio stations. I’m very proud of this work—led by our Enforcement Bureau and its outstanding field staff.”

Guard Band Licensee and Band Manager Annual Reports Due March 2

On January 28, the FCC issued a Public Notice reminding 700 MHz Guard Band Licensees and 220 MHz Band Managers (“Licensees”) of their obligation to file timely annual reports on or before Monday, March 2, 2019. In the annual reports, Licensees must provide information about the manner in which the spectrum in each of their markets is being utilized. The information provided should accurately convey the current level of service being offered in each licensed area, including information regarding coverage provided by Licensees’ operations and any spectrum lease agreements. Failure to file an annual report as required may result in enforcement action.

Licensees must file the required annual report information for each license held through the Commission’s Universal Licensing System (ULS).

BloostonLaw Contact: Richard Rubino.

Industry


FCC Issues Small Entity Compliance Guide for Truth in Caller ID Rules

On January 22, the FCC issued a Small Entity Compliance Guide for the recent Second Report and Order implementing RAY BAUM’S ACT. As we reported in a previous edition of the BloostonLaw Telecom Update, the Second Report and Order amends the Commission’s rules to encompass malicious spoofing activities directed at consumers in the United States from actors outside of our country and to expand the scope of covered communications services to reach caller ID spoofing using alternative voice and text messaging services.

The Guide provides a brief overview of the amendments, their compliance requirements, and notes the compliance deadline of February 5. Although the guide is intended to help small entities comply with the revised rules, it does not replace or supersede the rules and is not exhaustive. At best, the content of the Small Entity Compliance Guide may be considered as evidence of reasonableness or appropriateness in the context of fines, penalties, or damages.

Deadlines


FEBRUARY 1: FCC FORM 499-Q, TELECOMMUNICATIONS REPORTING WORKSHEET. All telecommunications common carriers that expect to contribute more than $10,000 to federal Universal Service Fund (USF) support mechanisms must file this quarterly form. The FCC has modified this form in light of its decision to establish interim measures for USF contribution assessments. The form contains revenue information from the prior quarter plus projections for the next quarter. Form 499-Q relates only to USF contributions. It does not relate to the cost recovery mechanisms for the Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) Fund, the North American Numbering Plan Administration (NANPA), and the shared costs of local number portability (LNP), which are covered in the annual Form 499-A that is due April 1.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens, Gerry Duffy, and Mary Sisak.

FEBRUARY 1: FCC FORM 502, NUMBER UTILIZATION AND FORECAST REPORT. Any wireless or wireline carrier (including paging companies) that have received number blocks—including 100, 1,000, or 10,000 number blocks—from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), a Pooling Administrator, or from another carrier, must file Form 502 by February 1. Carriers porting numbers for the purpose of transferring an established customer’s service to another service provider must also report, but the carrier receiving numbers through porting does not. Resold services should also be treated like ported numbers, meaning the carrier transferring the resold service to another carrier is required to report those numbers but the carrier receiving such numbers should not report them. Reporting carriers are required to include their FCC Registration Number (FRN). Reporting carriers file utilization and forecast reports semiannually on or before February 1 for the preceding six-month reporting period ending December 31, and on or before August 1 for the preceding six-month reporting period ending June 30.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens, Gerry Duffy, and Mary Sisak.

FEBRUARY 1: Live 911 Call Data Reports — Non-Nationwide Providers that do not provide coverage in any of the Test Cities must collect and report aggregate data based on the largest county within its footprint to APCO, NENA, and NASNA on the location technologies used for live 911 calls in those areas. Clients should obtain spreadsheets with their company’s compliance data from their E911 service provider (e.g., Intrado / West).

BloostonLaw Contact: Cary Mitchell.

MARCH 2: COPYRIGHT STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT FORM FOR CABLE COMPANIES. This form, plus royalty payment for the second half of calendar year 2019, is due March 1. The form covers the period July 1 to December 31, 2019, and is due to be mailed directly to cable TV operators by the Library of Congress’ Copyright Office. Because March 1 is a Sunday this year, this filing is due March 2. If you do not receive the form, please contact the firm.

BloostonLaw Contact: Gerry Duffy.

MARCH 2: CPNI ANNUAL CERTIFICATION. Carriers should modify (as necessary) and complete their “Annual Certification of CPNI Compliance” for 2020. The certification must be filed with the FCC by March 2, because March 1 is a Sunday this year. Note that the annual certification should include the following three required Exhibits: (a) a detailed Statement Explaining How The Company’s Operating Procedures Ensure Compliance With The FCC’S CPNI Rules to reflect the Company’s policies and information; (b) a Statement of Actions Taken Against Data Brokers; and (c) a Summary of Customer Complaints Regarding Unauthorized Release of CPNI. A company officer with personal knowledge that the company has established operating procedures adequate to ensure compliance with the rules must execute the Certification, place a copy of the Certification and accompanying Exhibits in the Company’s CPNI Compliance Records, and file the certification with the FCC in the correct fashion. Our clients can forward the original to BloostonLaw in time for the firm to make the filing with the FCC by March 1, if desired. BloostonLaw is prepared to help our clients meet this requirement, which we expect will be strictly enforced, by assisting with preparation of their certification filing; reviewing the filing to make sure that the required showings are made; filing the certification with the FCC, and obtaining a proof-of-filing copy for your records. Clients interested in obtaining BloostonLaw's CPNI compliance manual should contact the firm.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Gerry Duffy

MARCH 2: FCC FORM 477, LOCAL COMPETITION & BROADBAND REPORTING FORM. This annual form is due March 1 and September 1 annually. The FCC requires facilities-based wired, terrestrial fixed wireless, and satellite broadband service providers to report on FCC Form 477 the number of broadband subscribers they have in each census tract they serve. The Census Bureau changed the boundaries of some census tracts as part of the 2010 Census. Because March 1 is a Sunday this year, this filing is due March 2.

Specifically, three types of entities must file this form:

  1. Facilities-based Providers of Broadband Connections to End User Locations: Entities that are facilities-based providers of broadband connections – which are wired “lines” or wireless “channels” that enable the end user to receive information from and/or send information to the Internet at information transfer rates exceeding 200 kbps in at least one direction – must complete and file the applicable portions of this form for each state in which the entity provides one or more such connections to end user locations. For the purposes of Form 477, an entity is a “facilities-based” provider of broadband connections to end user locations if it owns the portion of the physical facility that terminates at the end user location, if it obtains unbundled network elements (UNEs), special access lines, or other leased facilities that terminate at the end user location and provisions/equips them as broadband, or if it provisions/equips a broadband wireless channel to the end user location over licensed or unlicensed spectrum. Such entities include incumbent and competitive local exchange carriers (LECs), cable system operators, fixed wireless service providers (including “wireless ISPs”), terrestrial and satellite mobile wireless service providers, BRS providers, electric utilities, municipalities, and other entities. (Such entities do not include equipment suppliers unless the equipment supplier uses the equipment to provision a broadband connection that it offers to the public for sale. Such entities also do not include providers of fixed wireless services (e.g., “Wi-Fi” and other wireless ethernet, or wireless local area network, applications) that only enable local distribution and sharing of a premises broadband facility.)
  2. Providers of Wired or Fixed Wireless Local Telephone Services: Incumbent and competitive LECs must complete and file the applicable portions of the form for each state in which they provide local exchange service to one or more end user customers (which may include “dial-up” ISPs).
  3. Providers of Mobile Telephony Services: Facilities-based providers of mobile telephony services must complete and file the applicable portions of this form for each state in which they serve one or more mobile telephony subscribers. A mobile telephony service is a real-time, two-way switched voice service that is interconnected with the public switched network using an in-network switching facility that enables the provider to reuse frequencies and accomplish seamless handoff of subscriber calls. A mobile telephony service provider is considered “facilities-based” if it serves a subscriber using spectrum for which the entity holds a license that it manages, or for which it has obtained the right to use via lease or other arrangement with a Band Manager.

BloostonLaw contacts: Ben Dickens and Gerry Duffy.


Law Offices Of
Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens,
Duffy & Prendergast, LLP

2120 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20037
(202) 659-0830
(202) 828-5568 (fax)

— CONTACTS —

Harold Mordkofsky, 202-828-5520, hma@bloostonlaw.com
Benjamin H. Dickens, Jr., 202-828-5510, bhd@bloostonlaw.com
Gerard J. Duffy, 202-828-5528, gjd@bloostonlaw.com
John A. Prendergast, 202-828-5540, jap@bloostonlaw.com
Richard D. Rubino, 202-828-5519, rdr@bloostonlaw.com
Mary J. Sisak, 202-828-5554, mjs@bloostonlaw.com
D. Cary Mitchell, 202-828-5538, cary@bloostonlaw.com
Salvatore Taillefer, Jr., 202-828-5562, sta@bloostonlaw.com

This newsletter is not intended to provide legal advice. Those interested in more information should contact the firm.

Calendar At-a-Glance


January
Jan. 29 – Comments are due on Robocall Blocking Report.
Jan. 31 – FCC Form 555 (Annual Lifeline ETC Certification Form) is due.

February
Feb. 1 – FCC Form 499-Q (Quarterly Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet) is due.
Feb. 1 – FCC Form 502 (Number Utilization and Forecast Report) is due.
Feb. 1 – Live 911 Call Data Reports from Non-Nationwide Providers are due.
Feb. 3 – Comments on Supply Chain Prohibitions FNPRM are due.
Feb. 3 – Comments on Initial Designations of Huawei and ZTE under Supply Chain Prohibitions due.
Feb. 6 – Comments are due on Cable Service Charge Notification NPRM.
Feb. 11 – Reply comments are due on Consent Requirements for Wireless Carrier Marketing Messages. Feb. 12 – Comments are due on Truth-in-Billing for VoIP proceeding.
Feb. 18 – Comments are due on Vertical Location Accuracy.
Feb. 21 – Comments are due on Removing Radiolocation/Amateur Allocations in 3.3-3.5 GHz Band.
Feb. 24 – Comments are due on Reassigned Numbers Database Technical Requirements.
Feb. 25 – Reply comments are due on Lifeline Reforms.
Feb. 21 – Reply comments are due on Cable Service Charge Notification NPRM.
Feb. 28 – Reply comments are due on Robocall Blocking Report.

March
Mar. 2 – Copyright Statement of Account Form for cable companies is due.
Mar. 2 – Annual CPNI Certification is due.
Mar. 2 – FCC Form 477 (Local Competition & Broadband Reporting) is due.
Mar. 2 – Annual 700 MHz Guard Band / 220 MHz Band Manager Report is due.
Mar. 3 – Reply comments on Supply Chain Prohibitions FNPRM are due.
Mar. 9 – Comments are due on All-Digital AM Broadcasting NPRM.
Mar. 9 – Reply comments are due on Reassigned Numbers Database Technical Requirements.
Mar. 13 – Reply comments are due on Truth-in-Billing for VoIP proceeding.
Mar. 16 – Reply comments are due on Vertical Location Accuracy.
Mar. 23 – Reply comments are due on Removing Radiolocation/Amateur Allocations in 3.3-3.5 GHz Band.
Mar. 31 – FCC Form 525 (Delayed Phasedown CETC Line Counts) is due.
Mar. 31 – FCC Form 508 (ICLS Projected Annual Common Line Requirement) is due.

April
Apr. 6 – Reply comments are due on All-Digital AM Broadcasting NPRM.


 BloostonLaw Private Users Update Vol. 20, No. 1 January 2020 

FCC Reaches $1.13 Million Settlement over Tower Lighting Investigation

The FCC has announced an agreement with Scripps Broadcasting Holdings to settle an investigation into the monitoring practices of its obstruction lighting on various television towers it acquired last year from Cordillera Communications as part of much larger transaction. Under the settlement agreement, Scripps has agreed to resolve the FCC’s investigation by paying a $1,130,000 penalty and abiding by a compliance plan to prevent further violations.

The FCC’s investigation is the result of an August 31, 2018 small airplane crash into a television tower in Kaplan, Louisiana that was owned by KATC Communications, LLC, a subsidiary of Cordillera Communications (“Cordillera”). Although the FCC found no evidence connecting the collision to a violation of the FCC’s rules by Cordillera, the FCC discovered other irregularities related to Cordillera’s compliance with FCC rules pertaining to communications towers. The FCC therefore broadened its investigation to cover all of Cordillera’s towers and observed problems with Cordillera’s practices for monitoring of tower lighting systems, maintenance of complete records of lighting failures, and notifications to the FCC of changes of ownership of two towers.

This consent decree demonstrates that the FCC takes its tower rules extremely seriously in order to ensure that aviation safety is maintained and that towers do not pose a hazard to air navigation. It is critically important that tower owners comply with the FCC’s antenna structure registration rules and ensure that antenna structures which require obstruction marking and lighting are properly marked and lit. Likewise, the FAA must be notified immediately if there is a failure or improper operation of any top mounted steady burning light or any flashing light.

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Richard Rubino

FCC Reminds Users of the 3.65-3.7 GHz Band of Transition Period Ending on April 17, 2020

The FCC has issued a public notice which reminds 3.65-3.7 GHz licensees that the transition period for licensees in the 3.65-3.7 GHz band will end on April 17, 2020, and that each grandfathered wireless broadband licensee must be in compliance with the new FCC Part 96 Citizens Broadband Radio Service (“CBRS”) Rules by that time. Licensees that did not receive protected incumbent status – either because they did not file for protection or because the licensee expanded beyond their protected zone – are not entitled interference protection from the Citizens Broadband Radio Service. As a result, the FCC is urging these licensees to contact Spectrum Access System (“SAS”) Administrators for the 3.55-3.7 GHz band for instructions on ensuring compliant future operations.

The FCC has yet to rule on pending requests to extend the April 17, 2020 deadline, including a blanket request for waiver filed jointly by the Wireless Internet Service Providers Association (“WISPA”) and the United Technology Council (“UTC”).

Clients that operate 3650-3700 MHz Service networks and that anticipate the need for additional time to upgrade their 3.5 GHz networks to meet Part 96 requirements should contact Cary Mitchell ASAP to discuss their options.

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast, Cary Mitchell and Richard Rubino

FCC Approves Four Spectrum Access System Administrators (SAS); Authorizes Full Commercial Deployment of 3.5 GHz CBRS The FCC has announced that it has certified CommScope, Federated Wireless, Inc. (“Federated”), Google and Sony, Inc. (“Sony”) as Spectrum Access System (“SAS”) Administrators in the 3.55-3.7 GHz band (“3.5 GHz band”), since each has met the requirements in Part 96 of the FCC’s Rules and is authorized to make their SAS available for commercial use for a five-year term.

This development is significant, because the SAS serves as an automated “frequency coordinator” to manage spectrum sharing among three tiers of spectrum users in the CBRS band. SAS certification also paves the way for the auction of Priority Access Licenses (Auction 105) that is scheduled to begin on June 25, 2020.

With this certification, these SASs are authorized to operate on a commercial basis. In that regard, each SAS will be required to:

  • Comply with all current and future Commission rules and policies, as well as all instructions issued by WTB, OET, or the Enforcement Bureau (“EB”), including any processes for interference reporting, consistent with Sections 0.241(j) and 0.331(f) of the Commission’s rules and procedures applicable to SASs on an ongoing basis.
  • As commercial deployments expand, demonstrate continued compliance with all current and future Commission rules and policies, which may include working with commercial and non-commercial users to demonstrate compliance with protection criteria.
  • Protect current and future federal incumbent operations in and near the 3.5 GHz band, as set forth in the Commission’s rules. Each SAS operator must be attentive to changes in protection criteria, such as those NTIA recently identified for Category B CBRS base stations, and to modifications to the list of sites identified by NTIA. Each SAS also must be able to receive and address reports of interference from federal Incumbent Access tier users. In addition, each SAS must work with the FCC, NTIA, and DoD to expeditiously address interference issues.

Prior to commercial availability, the 3.5 GHz CBRS band was used primarily by the Department of Defense (DoD), mostly for shipborne radar systems. To ensure that the DoD has continued access to the band,Environmental Sensing Capability (“ESC”) networks have been deployed along the U.S. coast. The ESC networks operated by CommScope, Federated Wireless, and Google inform the SAS administrators to activate a protection zone and dynamically reassign users in the area to other parts of the band, thus protecting DoD’s use of the spectrum while maximizing availability of CBRS spectrum across coastal areas.

A press release issued by the CBRS Alliance offered some additional detail about the CBRS full commercial deployment news. The CBRS Alliance focuses on the development of 4G and 5G technology for use in the CBRS band. The Alliance is also responsible for the OnGo brand used for CBRS offerings.

The CBRS Alliance estimates that the CBRS band will directly contribute as much as $15.6 billion to the U.S. economy, and that its actual value to consumers could be as much as $80-260 billion. The OnGo ecosystem is vast and opens a brand-new market for wireless communications and 5G services in the United States, touching rural broadband via fixed wireless Internet providers (WISPs), enterprise IT, hospitality, retail, real estate, industrial IoT, and transportation, among other sectors. OnGo-compatible mobile devices that are on the market today include the Google Pixel 4, Motorola’s 5G Moto Mod, Samsung Galaxy S10, Apple iPhone 11, LG G8 ThinQ, and OnePlus 7 Pro.

As part of its announcement, the FCC reminded 3650-3700 MHz Service licensees that their Part 90 operations will not be entitled to interference protection from CBRS operations beyond their current license term and it encouraged them to contact SAS Administrators to discuss options for integrating their operations into CBRS. As it stands, April 17, 2020 is the deadline for most 3650-3700 MHz Service licensees to comply with Part 96 CBRS rules.

BloostonLaw Contact: Cary Mitchell

FCC Adopts Streamlined Licensing Procedure for Small Satellites

Pursuant to the FCC’s Report and Order entitled “Streamlining Licensing Procedures for Small Satellites” (“Small Satellite Report and Order”), the FCC adopted a new alternative, optional licensing process for small satellites and spacecraft, called the “Part 25 streamlined small satellite process.” This new process allows qualifying applicants for small satellites and spacecraft to take advantage of an easier application process, a lower application fee, and a shorter timeline for review than currently exists for applicants under the FCC's existing Part 25 satellite licensing rules. The FCC’s action limits the regulatory burdens borne by applicants, while at the same time is designed to promote orbital debris mitigation and efficient use of spectrum. The FCC believes that its action supports and encourages increasing innovation in the small satellite sector, and helps to preserve U.S. leadership in space-based services and operations.

A new information collection will be added to the licensing application through a variety of additional certifications in order to provide the Commission and the public with necessary information about the operations of this growing area of satellite operations. Additionally, this information will be used by the FCC’s staff in order to ensure that the US is carrying out its treaty obligations under the World Trade Organization Basic Telecom Agreement.

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Richard Rubino

FCC Seeks Comment on Removing Radiolocation/Amateur Allocations in the 3.3-3.55 GHz Band

The FCC has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) in which it has proposed to remove the existing non-federal secondary radiolocation and amateur allocations in the 3.3-3.55 GHz band and to relocate incumbent non-federal operations out of the band, in order to prepare the band for possible expanded commercial wireless use. Comments will be due on February 21, 2020; and reply comments on March 23, 2020.

Under the FCC’s proposal, the allocation for non-federal radiolocation services in the 3.3-3.55 GHz band and the non-federal amateur allocation in the 3.3-3.5 GHz band would be eliminated. This NPRM also seeks comment on appropriate relocation options for incumbent non-federal users, either to the 3.1-3.3 GHz band or to other frequencies, on the transition mechanism and process for relocating existing non-federal users, and on potential relocation costs and considerations. The proposals in the NPRM are an initial step toward potential future shared use between federal operations and flexible use commercial services, consistent with the Commission's responsibilities specified in the MOBILE NOW Act to identify spectrum for new mobile and fixed wireless use, and to work in consultation with the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (“NTIA”) to evaluate the feasibility of allowing commercial wireless services to share use of spectrum between 3.1 and 3.55 GHz.

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast, Cary Mitchell and Richard Rubino

FCC Settles NEPA/NHPA Investigation for $20,000

Earlier this month, the FCC issued an Order entering into a consent decree to resolve the Enforcement Bureau’s investigation into allegations that Teton Communications, Inc. (“Teton Communications”) constructed a wireless facility without complying with the FCC’s environmental and historic preservation rules, including rules implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”) and the National Historic Preservation Act (“NHPA”). To settle this matter, Teton Communications admits that it violated the FCC’s environmental and historic preservation rules, will implement a robust compliance plan to ensure that it does not violate these rules in the future, and will pay a $20,000 civil penalty.

According to the Order, in September 2018, Teton Communications engaged an independent contractor to perform the required environmental and historic preservation reviews, including Tribal consultation procedures, for a proposed wireless facility in Idaho (“Idaho Tower”). Teton also hired the contractor to ascertain whether the Idaho Tower could significantly affect the environment. In response to a complaint by the relevant Tribal Historic Preservation Office, Teton Communications filed a response admitting that it began construction of the Idaho Tower on November 6, 2018, before completing the requisite Tribal consultation process and without conclusion of the statutorily mandated State Historic Preservation Office review.

This case provides a valuable reminder that in addition to traditional environmental and historic preservation issues, clients proposing tower construction and/or alterations must also be cognizant of potential tribal effects. A good resource for determining whether a tribe may have an interest in the county where you are proposing the construction of a tower is the HUD Tribal Directory Assessment Tool (“TDAT”) that was developed by the Office of Environment and Energy to assist users in identifying tribes that may have an interest in the location of a HUD-assisted project and to provide tribal contact information to assist users with the initiation of Section 106 consultations under the National Historic Preservation Act. The URL for TDAT is egis.hud.gov/TDAT. The Advisory Council for Historic Preservation (“ACHP”) also publishes Handbooks on various aspects of the Section 106 consultation process that can provide useful information.

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Richard Rubino

Non-Payment of Regulatory Fee Results in Order to Pay or Show Cause

The FCC has just issued an order to pay or show cause against Unidos Para Cristos, Inc. (“UPC”) – the licensee of a broadcast station in Texas. The order reflects that UPC has not paid any regulatory fees associated with its broadcast station since FY2013. As a result, in addition to the normal regulatory fee due, UPC was also assessed a late fee penalty of 25 percent as well as associated penalties, interest and administrative costs associated with the FCC’s collection efforts.

It is important to note that the FCC’s enforcement tools under the regulatory fee program are not just financial. The FCC also has the authority to revoke license authorizations for failure to pay regulatory fees (or related interest and penalties) in a timely manner. In this case, the FCC is requiring UPC to provide “documented evidence” within 60 calendar days of its order that full payment of the regulatory fee and associated amounts have been paid (or in the alternative, show cause why the payment is inapplicable or should otherwise be waived or deferred).

For those of our clients who must pay regulatory fees on an annual basis (such as earth station and commercial paging licensees as well as telephone company operations), it is critical that the fee be paid in a timely manner. The FCC has a de minimis threshold that must be met before a fee is due from a particular regulatee. If the client is de minimis, we recommend the filing of a letter with the FCC each year as documentation of that status. Most Part 90 shared use Private Land Mobile licensees are assessed their regulatory fees as part of their initial license application or license renewal application fees, and therefore need not be concerned with the annual requirement. [emphasis added]

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Richard Rubino

FCC Enters into $16,000 Consent Decree for Unauthorized Operation in 3.65-3.7 GHz Band

The FCC has entered into a consent decree with Brevard Wireless, Inc. dba Florida High Speed Internet (“Florida High Speed”), a 3.65-3.7 GHz band licensee, for unauthorized operation of a transmitter.

The 3.65-3.7 GHz band is currently licensed on a non-exclusive nationwide basis. Unlike other radio services, the issuance of a license grants the licensee no operational rights. Rather, the licensee must first register each transmitter/base station with the FCC and receive approval for the registration from the FCC before it can commence operation.

In this case, the FCC’s investigation was the result of an interference complaint from the licensee of a Domestic Fixed Satellite Earth Station operating in the 3700-4200 MHz band near Jacksonville, Florida. Investigation revealed that Florida High Speed was operating facilities near Jacksonville and St. Augustine, Florida. In exchange for termination of the FCC’s investigation, Florida High Speed agreed to make a “voluntary contribution” to the US Treasury in the amount of $16,000 as well as enter into a detailed compliance program — the violation of which could result in additional penalties.

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Richard Rubino

FCC Announces Updates to Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council Best Practices Database

Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (“PSHSB”) has announced the FCC’s Communications Security, Reliability, and Interoperability Council (“CSRIC”) Best Practices database has been updated. At its December quarterly meeting, CSRIC VII unanimously approved an update to the database that includes best practices from CSRIC VI (addressing communications network security, emergency preparedness, and disaster recovery) and retired best practices that have become obsolete.

The mission of the CSRIC is to provide recommendations to the FCC regarding ways the FCC can strive for security, reliability, and interoperability of communications systems. These recommendations routinely include best practices for industry and public safety organizations and are searchable on a database maintained by the FCC.

It is important to note that when CSRIC recommends new best practices, the FCC updates the database accordingly, including the retiring of any older best practices that have been superseded. The CSRIC Best Practices database can be accessed on the FCC website at https://opendata.fcc.gov/Public-Safety/CSRIC-Best-Practices/qb45-rw2t/data. More information about CSRIC can be found at https://www.fcc.gov/about-fcc/advisory-committees/communications-security-reliability-and-interoperability-council-vii

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Richard Rubino

FCC Seeks Comment on Zebra Technologies Request for Waiver of Part 15 to Permit Use of Ultra-Wide Band Positioning System

Zebra Technologies (“Zebra”) has requested a waiver of Part 15 of the FCC’s rules to allow it to certify a version of its Dart positioning system for operation in the 7125-8500 MHz band. Zebra states that its system, which presently operates as an ultra-wideband (“UWB”) device in the 5925-7250 MHz band, is used to track small battery-operated tags attached to persons, assets, or safety equipment over a range of 100 meters to an accuracy of less than 30 centimeters. Applications include tracking players in sports venues and preventing accidents for airplane maintenance personnel while working on moving platforms. Zebra states that a waiver of any one of three different rules (Sections 15.517(a), 15.519(a)(1), or 15.250) would allow it to use its Dart system at 7125-8500 MHz. It therefore only asks for a waiver of one of these rules, because of its concern that future changes to the 5925-7250 MHz band (to include the Commission’s proposal to allow unlicensed Wi-Fi type devices) could make the band less suitable for low-power positioning due to incompatible uses. The FCC is seeking comment on waiver request, including the relative merits of each of the three options Zebra has identified. In this regard, each of the rule sections provides, as follows:

Section 15.517 governs the technical requirements for indoor UWB systems. Section 15.517(a) limits operation under the rule to UWB transmitters employed solely for indoor operation. Zebra states that it would require a waiver of this section because the Dart system has some outdoor applications.

Section 15.519 governs the technical requirements for hand held UWB systems. Under Section 15.519(a)(1), a UWB device may transmit only when it is sending information to an associated receiver, and must cease transmission if it fails to receive an acknowledgement from the associated receiver that its transmission is being received. Because Dart tags transmit but do not receive transmissions, Zebra states that it would need a waiver of section 15.519(a)(1) for the Dart system to operate as a hand held UWB device.

Section 15.250 governs operation of wideband systems in the 5925-7250 MHz band. Specifically, Section 15.250(a) requires that the -10 dB bandwidth of a device operating under this section must be contained within the 5925-7250 MHz band under all conditions of operation. Zebra states that it would need a waiver of the upper frequency limit in Section 15.250 for the Dart system to operate as a wideband system under this rule.

The Comment period on this proposal ends February 18, 2020.

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Richard Rubino


Complete Technical Services for the Communications and Electronics Industries


Technical Services Inc.

Texas Registered Engineering Firm #F16945

“It's more than Push-To-Talk”

7711 Scotia Drive
Dallas, TX 75248-3112

Ira Wiesenfeld, P.E.

President • Principal Engineer
CETsr CA GROL IEEE LSM
WA5GXP

Cell: 214-707-7711
E-mail: iwiesenfel@aol.com
Toll Free: 844-IWA-TECH (844-492-8324)

Design  •  Installation  •  Maintenance  •  Training

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

From: Alan Gilmour
Subject: An old pager stat from USA Today
Date: January 30, 2020
To: Brad Dye

Thought you might like this flash from the past.

Alan Gilmour
RadioWorks Communications Inc.
e-mail: alan.gilmour@radioworks.ca
Ph (250) 475-3400 Ext 229
Fx (250) 475-3444  


MUSIC VIDEO OF THE WEEK

“GYPSY JAZZ”

HOT CLUB DU NAX

—Joseph Joseph


Source: YouTube  


Best regards,
brad's signature
Newsletter Editor
73 DE K9IQY
Licensed since 1957
Current member or former member of these organizations.
 

MENSA MEMBER
mensa member
If you are curious about why I joined Mensa, click here .

A Public Library of
animated gif
Paging and Wireless Messaging
Information
Wireless
wireless logo medium
Messaging

Brad Dye
P.O. Box 266
Fairfield, IL 62837 USA

Critical Messaging
cmma
Association
European Mobile Messaging Association
emma logo
Former Board Member
ZP5TQ

Radio Club of Paraguay
Quarter Century
qcwa
Wireless Association
Back To Paging
pagerman
Still The Most Reliable
Wireless Protocol
For Emergencies!
American Association

of Woodturners
U.S. Navy

Radioman
U.S. Navy
Radioman

radioman second class
Second Class
Petty Officer
Boy Scouts of America

National Honor Society
Creator of the

Paging Wheel of Fortune
National Skeet

Shooting Association
The National

Rifle Association
American
Radio

arrl
Relay
League
The Radio Club
of America
Life is good!

I am a person in long-term recovery.

CONTACT INFO & LINKS

Skype: braddye
Twitter: @BradDye1
Telephone: +1-618-599-7869
E–mail: brad@braddye.com
Wireless: Consulting page
Paging: Home Page
Marketing & Engineering Papers
K9IQY: Ham Radio Page

Amateur Radio
K9IQY

  • ex KN9IQY, KN4BK, KM5NK, WB4JCF, ZP5TQ, WA4VXU, WA9RVL, /TI2, /9Y4, /6Y5, /KP4, HH2FJ
  • Licensed FCC Amateur Radio operator since 1957
  • Licensed FCC First-Class-Commercial Operator/Engineer since 1964
VETERAN

United States Navy

Home Page Directory Consulting Newsletters Free Subscription Products Reference Glossary Send e-mail