newsletter logo

Wireless News Aggregation

Friday — February 19, 2021 — Issue No. 948

Welcome Back To

The Wireless
Messaging News

This Week's Wireless News Headlines

  • Ethernet: Why your home office could use more of it
  • British Columbia Radio Amateur Copies Signal from Mars-Orbiting Satellite
  • The law firm of Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens, Duffy & Prendergast, LLP, on behalf of its rural and independent telephone carrier and wireless service provider clients that have interests in developing and deploying rural 5G networks and providing IoT and other advanced spectrum-based services (the “Blooston Rural Carriers”), hereby submits its reply to oppositions to Petitions for Reconsideration filed in the above-captioned proceeding
  • Inside Towers
    • Trade Associations Send Letter to White House: “Build Broadband for All”
  • BloostonLaw Telecom Update
    • REMINDER: First Performance Measurement Pre-Testing Due March 31
    • House Republicans Announce Broadband Bill Package
    • FCC to Re-Charter NANC, Solicits Nominations
    • Comments on STIR/SHAKEN Certificate Revocation Appeal Process
    • Comments on NECA Average Schedule Formula Modifications Due March 15
    • Next Meeting of Precision Agriculture Task Force Scheduled for March 12
    • Deadlines
    • Calendar At-a-Glance
    • BloostonLaw Contacts
  • Music Video Of The Week
    • Tuba Skinny
    • “The Creeper”

Wireless Messaging News

  • Emergency Radio Communications
  • Wireless Messaging
  • Critical Messaging
  • Two-way Radio
  • Technology
  • Telemetry
  • Science
  • Paging
  • Wi-Fi
wireless logo medium


This doesn't mean that nothing is ever published here that mentions a US political party—it just means that the editorial policy of this newsletter is to remain neutral on all political issues. We don't take sides.

About Us

A new issue of the Wireless Messaging Newsletter is posted on the web each week. A notification goes out by e-mail to subscribers on most Fridays around noon central US time. The notification message has a link to the actual newsletter on the web. That way it doesn’t fill up your incoming e-mail account.

There is no charge for subscription and there are no membership restrictions. Readers are a very select group of wireless industry professionals, and include the senior managers of many of the world’s major Paging and Wireless Messaging companies. There is an even mix of operations managers, marketing people, and engineers — so I try to include items of interest to all three groups. It’s all about staying up-to-date with business trends and technology.

I regularly get readers’ comments, so this newsletter has become a community forum for the Paging, and Wireless Messaging communities. You are welcome to contribute your ideas and opinions. Unless otherwise requested, all correspondence addressed to me is subject to publication in the newsletter and on my web site. I am very careful to protect the anonymity of those who request it.

I spend the whole week searching the INTERNET for news that I think may be of interest to you — so you won’t have to. This newsletter is an aggregator — a service that aggregates news from other news sources. You can help our community by sharing any interesting news that you find.

Editorial Policy

Editorial Opinion pieces present only the opinions of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any of advertisers or supporters. This newsletter is independent of any trade association. I don't intend to hurt anyone's feelings, but I do freely express my own opinions.



These are uncertain times.

How would you like to help support The Wireless Messaging News? Your support is needed. New advertising and donations have fallen off considerably.
A donation through PayPal is easier than writing and mailing a check and it comes through right away.

There is not a lot of news about Paging these days but when anything significant comes out, you will probably see it here. I also cover text messaging to other devices and various articles about related technology.

Subscribe Here


* required field

If you would like to subscribe to the newsletter just fill in the blanks in the form above, and then click on the “Subscribe” bar.

Advertiser Index

Easy Solutions  (Vaughan Bowden)
Frank Moorman
IWA Technical Services, Inc.  (Ira Wiesenfeld)
Leavitt Communications  (Phil Leavitt)
Prism-IPX Systems  (Jim Nelson & John Bishop)
Paging & Wireless Network Planners LLC  (Ron Mercer)
Wex International Limited

Service Monitors and Frequency Standards for Sale

Motorola Service Monitor

IFR Service Monitor

IFR 500A Service Monitor

(Images are typical units, not actual photos of items offered for sale here.)

Qty Item Notes
2 Late IFR 500As  
1 Motorola R 2001D  
4 Motorola R 2400 and 2410A  
5 Motorola R 2600 and R 2660 late S/Ns  
4 Motorola R 1200  
2 Motorola R 2200  
2 Stand-alone Efratom Rubidium Frequency Standards 10 MHz output
1 Telawave model 44 wattmeter Recently calibrated
1 IFR 1000S  
All sold with 7-day ROR (Right of Refusal), recent calibration, operation manual, and accessories.  
Factory carrying cases for each with calibration certificate.  
Many parts and accessories  

Frank Moorman animated left arrow

(254) 596-1124

Calibration and Repair (NIST 17025)
Upgrades: We can add the FE 5680A 10 MHz rubidium clock to your unit. Small unit fits into the well in the battery compartment — making it a world standard accuracy unit that never needs to be frequency calibrated.
Please inquire by telephone or e-mail.
Most Service Monitor Accessories in stock.

Leavitt Communications


50 years experience providing and supporting radio and paging customers worldwide. Call us anytime we can be useful!






Minitor VI

Leavitt sells and supports most pager brands. We stock Unication G1, G5, Secure and some Elegant pagers. Call or e-mail for price and availability.

Philip C. Leavitt, V.P.
Leavitt Communications
7508 N. Red Ledge Drive
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253

Web Site:
Mobile phone: 847-494-0000
Telephone: 847-955-0511
Fax: 270-447-1909
Skype ID: pcleavitt

Ethernet: Why your home office could use more of it

Nearly 50 years old, this networking technology remains one of the best ways to connect home and office equipment to the Internet. We review the many options.

By Jason Perlow for Tech Broiler | February 18, 2021 — 17:06 GMT (09:06 PST)

It's been almost a year since many of us started working from home, and it doesn't look like that's going to change anytime soon. In previous Jason Squared shows, Jason Cipriani and I have talked about securing your home Internet. and even how to improve your Wi-Fi signal. However, there are alternative ways to improve connectivity throughout your home. Today, we will talk about one of the oldest — and perhaps still one of the best ways to connect your equipment to the Internet. — Ethernet.


Ethernet is a wired network communications standard developed in the early 1970s by a computer engineer named Bob Metcalfe (who, for many years, was also a well-known computer industry columnist at InfoWorld and also was responsible for forming 3COM, which HP later bought in 2010) and his team of researchers at Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center.

Category 5e Ethernet Cables

Steve Heap, Getty Images/iStockphoto

Over the years, Ethernet morphed from using coaxial cable to twisted pair cable and fiberoptic cables. The original standard called for network frames sent at 10Mbps. Today, it's not uncommon for Ethernet to communicate at 1Gbps over twisted pair cable. Ethernet can move as fast as 40Gbps/100Gbps using fiberoptic cables on enterprise networks within data centers or in specialized environments.


Chances are, you probably already do use at least some Ethernet at home. Most consumer broadband installations will have a residential gateway that incorporates Wi-Fi and some broadband access device, like a cable modem or an optical network terminal (ONT). Those will be connected with a short Cat-5 or Cat-6 Ethernet cable and the modular RJ-45 8-pin connector.

There are many homes in which that's likely the extent of their Ethernet install. But all home routers/residential gateways have at least one or more additional Ethernet ports on them, allowing you to expand that Ethernet network. So, for example, in my own home, with my AT&T ARRIS residential gateway (the main router), I have a few extra Ethernet ports. I have a 24-port Ethernet switch connected to one of these to add more Ethernet-connected devices.

But you're not stuck with the number of ports on your router. An Ethernet Switch is like the USB hubs you can buy for your PC or Mac. If you run out of Ethernet ports, you buy a switch, and it will give you more network interfaces.


There are a lot of reasons. Ethernet is super-reliable for starters. It is secure; it's far more difficult for someone to sniff your network traffic if you use Ethernet, especially if you are using something like a VLAN. It's also considerably faster than the network connectivity you will get in most home environments with Wi-Fi. Even with Wi-Fi 6, you will only get 450Mbps to 650Mbps speeds under optimal conditions; you will still get interference and latency. But with my 1Gbps fiber connection from AT&T, I frequently get over 900Mbps downloads, close to wireline speeds, when using a computer connected to the Ethernet switch.

The other thing that's good about Ethernet is it has pretty high distance limitations, like about 100 meters per run. So you can get the full speed out of that cable over that distance. This is good to have if you have a multi-story home, where you might have, say, an entertainment center in your basement or a bedroom on an upper floor that you want to have high-speed network connectivity.

Perhaps the Wi-Fi from the bottom floor or even your mesh network just isn't cutting it because there are too many walls or whatever. You can bridge your network using a Wi-Fi access point using Ethernet, and a long cable runs to the switch or the router. You need to be able to drop that cable through a wall soffit, through the attic, or a crawlspace, or run it along the wall under the carpet to where it has to go.

In my case, my office is in the room next to where all my broadband equipment is, so I hired a handyman to install an Ethernet jack on both sides of the adjoining wall. But I know many people who have just drilled through the wall, bore a hole, and put an inexpensive plastic plate there or a grommet kit that is used for pushing cables through. You can get those at Home Depot.


An inexpensive 8-port Ethernet switch, made by Netgear.

It doesn't have to be expensive. I frequently see unmanaged desktop 16-port Gigabit Ethernet switches from Netgear, TP-LINK, and D-Link on Amazon for less than $60. You can buy pre-fabricated cables that are as long as 100 feet for about $22 from Best Buy or Amazon, and I have seen them as cheap as $12 at Walmart, too. But you can also crimp your own cables with a crimping tool and buy the twisted pair cable spools and the RJ-45 heads, and that's not that expensive if you have to do your own wiring.

Many streaming devices have Ethernet ports already built-in, such as the Roku, the Amazon Fire TV, the Apple TV, and gaming consoles like the Xbox and the Playstation. Network adapters for laptops are also not that expensive. We talked about hubs a few weeks ago; many on the market include Ethernet and HDMI and extra USB-C and USB-A ports for like $40, such as the one from Anker.


The higher-end models are managed switches and are more expensive because they have special segmenting and security capabilities, such as for VLANs. These are typically for small and medium business use. But the other thing these more expensive switches can do is Power over Ethernet or PoE.

In addition to carrying Ethernet communication, a Cat5-Cat6 twisted pair cable can also carry power. That means, if you wanted to place, say, a Wireless Access Point in some remote part of your house or in your small business where no AC power outlets exist, all you need to do is string the Cat5 cable to that location and plug in the device. This is useful for broadcasting a Wi-Fi signal to a wide-open area and mounting an access point on a ceiling.

For example, in my house, I have my main AP mounted high on a wall in my living room, and that signal can reach a large part of my house. It's powered by a PoE switch connection in a spare bedroom where all my communications equipment is, including the broadband connection. To use PoE, in addition to a PoE compatible switch — and you can get them as cheaply as $80 for an 8-port version — you need to have a device that can be powered by PoE, such as a business-class access point. You can find these on Amazon for like $100 or less; Netgear has a Wi-Fi 6 one for $130. So if you're having a tough time with mesh networking routers — like I have — this is another way to get whole home or whole business Wi-Fi coverage.


A pair of MoCA coaxial to Cat5 Ethernet transceivers, made by Actiontec.

There are other ways of moving Ethernet. One way of doing that is MoCA, or Multimedia over Coax, which uses the Coaxial cable you might already have in your home from back in the Cable TV or the Satellite TV days. Many homes have to coax installed many years ago, but you can also coax outdoors and back into your home if needed, as it is a thick, shielded copper cable that is designed better to be protected from the elements. A MoCA adapter is a device connected in pairs, so you have one at one side of the coax cable you want to send Ethernet signal and one at the receiving end where you might put a switch or, say, an access point or something else. Actiontec, for example, sells these in pairs for $170. It advertises up to 2.5Gbps speeds over existing coaxial cable, which is extremely fast. Trendnet sells a similar product for $110, and you can also get that on Amazon.


A pair of HomePlug AV2 Powerline to Ethernet adapters, made by TP-LINK

Finally, we get to something called Ethernet over Powerline, or HomePlug AV2, which is like the opposite of PoE; we are sending Ethernet signal over the AC power wires that are already inside your home. Again, this uses a pair of devices. One is plugged into the wall, and then Ethernet is cabled to your switch. Another one is plugged into the wall where you want the Ethernet signal transmitted to, and then there's an Ethernet cable coming out of that, which plugs into whatever you want to plug it into. Using this method, it's possible to have these adapters plugged into outlets all over your home, so your electrical system becomes one big network.

Now there are some gotchas to this: If your wiring is ancient and janky, this might not work. You also might not get good throughput out of this, either. However, it is theoretically possible to get up to a gigabit connection doing things this way. You can get the Homeplug AV2 adapters in pairs for about $70$80 on Amazon, and companies like Netgear, Trendnet, TP-Link, and D-Link make them. In my home, in the past, I've seen as high as 400Mbps per second when extending my living room's entertainment center with this type of equipment — which is about par for the course with the fastest most people are going to see with 802.11ac Wi-Fi in optimal scenarios.

Source: ZDNet  

Paging Transmitters 150/900 MHz

The RFI High Performance Paging Transmitter is designed for use in campus, city, state and country-wide paging systems. Designed for use where reliable simulcast systems where RF signal overlap coverage is critical.

  • Commercial Paging systems.
  • Healthcare Paging systems.
  • Public Safety Emergency Services Paging systems.
  • Demand Response Energy Grid Management.

Built-in custom interface for Prism-IPX ipBSC Base Controller for remote control, management and alarm reporting.

  • Use as a stand-alone unit or in wide area network.
  • Mix with other transmitter brands in an existing paging network.
  • Adjustable from 20-250 watts.
  • 110/240 VAC or 48VDC.
  • Absolute Delay Correction.
  • Remote Diagnostics.
  • Configurable alarm thresholds.
  • Integrated Isolator.
  • Superb Reliability.
  • Improved amplifier efficiency.
  • Most reliable high-powered paging transmitter available.

Prism-IPX Systems LLC.

11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ph: 678-242-5290 Email:


“Is Paging Going Away?” by Jim Nelson

  • Click here for English.
  • Click here for German. (Berlin Revision: November 8, 2016)
  • Click here for French.

Here is an English PDF edit of this paper formatted with page breaks and suitable for printing.

Volunteers needed for translations into other languages.

Board of Advisors

The Wireless Messaging News
Board of Advisors

Frank McNeill
Founder & CEO
Communications Specialists
Jim Nelson
President & CEO
Prism Systems International
Kevin D. McFarland, MSCIS
Sr. Application Systems Analyst
Medical Center
Paul Lauttamus, President
Lauttamus Communications & Security
R.H. (Ron) Mercer
Wireless Consultant
Barry Kanne
Paging Industry Veteran
Ira Wiesenfeld, P.E.
Consulting Engineer
Allan Angus
Consulting Engineer

The Board of Advisor members are people with whom I have developed a special rapport, and have met personally. They are not obligated to support the newsletter in any way, except with advice, and maybe an occasional letter to the editor.


Can You Help The Newsletter?

animated left arrow

You can help support The Wireless Messaging News by clicking on the PayPal Donate button above. It is not necessary to be a member of PayPal to use this service.

Reader Support

Newspapers generally cost 75¢ $1.50 a copy and they hardly ever mention paging or wireless messaging, unless in a negative way. If you receive some benefit from this publication maybe you would like to help support it financially?

A donation of $50.00 would certainly help cover a one-year period. If you are wiling and able, please click on the PayPal Donate button above.


British Columbia Radio Amateur Copies Signal from Mars-Orbiting Satellite


Scott Tilley's backyard dish.

As reported on, Canadian radio amateur Scott Tilley, VE7TIL, has snagged another signal from deep space. His latest conquest has been to copy the signal from China’s Tianwen-1 (pronounced “tee-EN-ven”) probe, which went into orbit around Mars on February 10. Tilley told that the probe’s X-band signal was “loud and audible.”

“It was a treasure hunt,” Tilley told He explained that while the spacecraft did post its frequency with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), it was too vague for precise tuning (X band is between 8 GHz and 12 GHz).

Launched last July, Tianwen-1 represents China’s first Mars mission. It consists of an orbiter and a rover, which will land on the Martian surface in May or June 2021. It is able to photograph the planet’s surface while in orbit.

Finding signals from deep space is a sub-hobby for Tilley, who seeks what he calls “zombie satellites” among other signal sources. In 2020, he tracked and identified signals from the experimental UHF military communication satellite LES-5. Tilley said he found the satellite in what he called a geostationary “graveyard” orbit after noting a modulated carrier on 236.7487 MHz. Launched in 1967, LES-5 was supposed to shut down in 1972, but it continues to operate as long as its solar panels are facing the sun, Tilley explained.

In 2018, while hunting for an undisclosed US government spacecraft lost in a launch mishap, he spotted the signature of IMAGE (Imager for Magnetopause-to-Aurora Global Exploration), a NASA spacecraft believed to have died in December 2005. The discovery delighted space scientists.

Tilley has also picked up signals from NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, and the United Arab Emirates Hope probe, both orbiting Mars some 124 million miles away. He uses a homemade 60-centimeter dish and relies on software-defined radios (SDRs) to accomplish the task.

Radio amateurs have been listening for signals from space since the 1957 launch of Sputnik 1, which transmitted at around 20 MHz.

Source: ARRL  


Easy Solutions

easy solutions

Providing Expert Support and Service Contracts for all Glenayre Paging Systems.

The GL3000 is the most prolific paging system in the world and Easy Solutions gladly welcomes you to join us in providing reliable support to the paging industry for many more decades in the future.

Easy Solutions provides cost effective computer and wireless solutions at affordable prices. We can help in most any situation with your communications systems. We have many years of experience and a vast network of resources to support the industry, your system and an ever changing completive landscape.

  • We treat our customers like family. We don’t just fix problems . . . We recommend and implement better cost-effective solutions.
  • We are not just another vendor . . . We are a part of your team. All the advantages of high priced full-time employment without the cost.
  • We are not in the Technical Services business . . . We are in the Customer Satisfaction business.

Experts in Paging Infrastructure

  • Glenayre, Motorola, Unipage, etc.
  • Excellent Service Contracts
  • Full Service—Beyond Factory Support
  • Making systems More Reliable and MORE PROFITABLE for over 30 years.

Please see our web site for exciting solutions designed specifically for the Wireless Industry. We also maintain a diagnostic lab and provide important repair and replacement parts services for Motorola and Glenayre equipment. Call or  e-mail  us for more information.

Easy Solutions
3220 San Simeon Way
Plano, Texas 75023

Vaughan Bowden
Telephone: 972-898-1119
Telephone: 214 785-8255


I would like to recommend Easy Solutions for Support of all Glenayre Paging Equipment. This Texas company is owned and operated by Vaughan Bowden. I have known Vaughan for over 35 years. Without going into a long list of his experience and qualifications, let me just say that he was the V.P. of Engineering at PageNet which was—at that time—the largest paging company in the world. So Vaughan knows Paging.

GTES is no longer offering support contracts. GTES was the original group from Vancouver that was setup to offer support to customers that wanted to continue with the legacy Glenayre support. Many U.S. customers chose not to use this service because of the price and the original requirement to upgrade to version 8.0 software (which required expensive hardware upgrades, etc.). Most contracts ended as of February 2018.

If you are at all concerned about future support of Glenayre products, especially the “king of the hill” the GL3000 paging control terminal, I encourage you to talk to Vaughan about a service contract and please tell him about my recommendation.

Click on the image above for more info about advertising here.

INTERNET Protocol Terminal

The IPT accepts INTERNET or serial messaging using various protocols and can easily convert them to different protocols, or send them out as paging messages.

An ideal platform for hospitals, on-site paging applications, or converting legacy systems to modern protocols.

Input Protocols: Serial and IP
Output Protocols: Serial and IP
FLEX (optional PURC control)   POCSAG (optional PURC control)

Additional/Optional Features

  • Database of up to 5000 subscribers.
  • 4 serial ports on board.
  • Up to 8 phone lines (DID or POTS).
  • Can be configured for auto-fail-over to hot swap standby.
  • 1RU rack mount unit appliance—no moving parts.
  • Easily secure legacy system messages leaving site for HIPAA compliance.
  • Only purchase the protocols/options you need.
  • Add Paging Encryption for HIPAA compliance on site.

Prism-IPX Systems LLC.

11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ph: 678-242-5290 e-mail:

Paging Data Receiver PDR-4

The PDR-4 is a multi-function paging data receiver that decodes paging messages and outputs them via the serial port, USB or Ethernet connectors.

Designed for use with Prism-IPX ECHO software Message Logging Software to receive messages and log the information for proof of transmission over the air, and if the data was error free.

  • Option—decode capcode list or all messages.
  • Large capcode capacity.
  • Serial, USB and Ethernet output.
  • POCSAG or FLEX page decoding, special SA protocols.
  • Receivers for paging bands in VHF, UHF, 900 MHz.
  • Message activated Alarm Output.
  • 8 programmable relay outputs.
  • Send notifications of a system problem.
  • Synthesized Receiver Tuning.
  • Selectivity better than 60 dB.
  • Frequencies 148-174, 450-470, 929-932 MHz.
  • Image Rejection better than 55 dB.
  • Spurious Rejection better than 55 dB.
  • Channel Spacing 12.5 or 25 kHz.
  • Power 5VDC.
  • Receiving Sensitivity 5µV at 1200 bps.

Prism-IPX Systems LLC.

11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ph: 678-242-5290 e-mail:

Wireless Network Planners

Wireless Network Planners
Wireless Specialists

R.H. (Ron) Mercer
217 First Street
East Northport, NY 11731

ron mercer
Telephone: 631-786-9359 left arrow left arrow

Before the
Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of

Establishing a 5G Fund for Rural America


GN Docket No. 20-32


The law firm of Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens, Duffy & Prendergast, LLP, on behalf of its rural and independent telephone carrier and wireless service provider clients that have interests in developing and deploying rural 5G networks and providing IoT and other advanced spectrum-based services (the “Blooston Rural Carriers”), hereby submits its reply to oppositions to Petitions for Reconsideration filed in the above-captioned proceeding.1

The Blooston Rural Carriers agree with petitioners NTCA/RWA and the Rural Coalition, and supporting comments of CCA, that the Commission should reconsider its decision to restrict areas with any unsubsidized 4G LTE service from receiving 5G Fund support. Petitioners and supporting commenters are correct that the presence of unsubsidized 4G LTE service in a rural area should not be viewed a reliable indicator whether 5G networks will be deployed in that same area without support. Robust 5G networks will require billions of dollars in network investment, both in wireless technology and backhaul facilities, as well as deployment of an entirely new class of “small cells” in order to meet their revolutionary promise. Incumbent providers of 4G LTE service will have little economic incentive to make this investment absent competitive pressure. Moreover, allowing these areas to be eligible for 5G Fund support will ensure that rural communities see the benefits of 5G services with minimal delay, by local service providers that in turn create and support local jobs, and this will be a necessary spark to promote additional network investment by 4G LTE incumbents.

The Commission and T-Mobile have pointed to T-Mobile’s merger commitments as grounds for concluding that 5G deployments can be reasonably expected where 4G LTE networks have been deployed. However, T-Mobile has previously sought to modify or delay its 5G buildout commitments to state regulators.2 Availability of 5G Fund support, in conjunction with more accurate Digital Opportunity Data Collection (“DODC”) maps, is a far more reliable (and direct) mechanism to ensure that rural 5G is not just “5G Lite.”

The Blooston Rural Carriers agree with the Rural Coalition that the Commission must refrain from phasing down legacy high-cost support until after it concludes the 5G Fund auction and distributes funds to auction winners, not sooner.3 As the comments of CCA correctly note, wireless networks require ongoing investment and updates, and rural carriers who receive legacy support “continue to use it today to maintain, build out and improve their networks.”4 Curtailing that funding too early would undermine the viability of those networks and jeopardize the available of existing wireless services.

Finally, the Blooston Rural Carriers agree with CTIA5 and commenters who urge the Commission to reconsider its unduly harsh penalty for noncompliance with 5G Fund usage or buildout requirements and instead to limit potential recovery to amounts an ETC failed to spend in conformance with the rules in effect for the year the support was disbursed. In this regard, under provisions of the 5G Order, the FCC departed from its Connect America Fund (CAF) precedent and announced that it would penalize legacy high-cost recipients that cannot spend the full amount required in given year on 5G service not by recovering only the unspent amount, but by recovering all funding “not spent on the deployment, operation, and/or maintenance of voice and broadband networks that support 5G meeting the performance requirements.” Such a requirement would be unnecessarily punitive, and it would provide a disincentive to small and rural service providers that are often in the best position to ensure rapid deployment of 5G service in a manner that is responsible to local needs. The Blooston Rural Carriers join with AT&T in urging the Commission to adopt CTIA’s proposed modification of the non-compliance measures so they apply only to support not spent in compliance with the new spending rules.


In conclusion, the Blooston Rural Carriers strongly believe the FCC should determine 5G Fund eligibility based on the presence or absence of unsubsidized 5G service after more accurate DODC coverage data is available. Basing this decision on the availability unsubsidized 4G LTE is just guesswork when certainty is needed in pursuit of this important policy objective. The Commission should refrain from phasing down legacy high-cost support until after it concludes the 5G Fund auction and distributes funds to auction winners; and it should reconsider its unduly harsh penalty for noncompliance with 5G Fund usage or buildout requirements and instead limit potential recovery to amounts an ETC failed to spend in conformance with the rules in effect for the year the support was disbursed.



Respectfully submitted,


D. Cary Mitchell
John A. Prendergast
Their Attorneys

Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens, Duffy & Prendergast, LLP
2120 L Street, NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
Tel. (202) 659-0830
Dated: February 18, 2021

1 See Rural Wireless Association, Inc. and NTCA – The Rural Broadband Association Joint Petition for Reconsideration, GN Docket No. 20-32 (filed Dec. 28, 2020) (“NTCA/RWA Petition”); Petition for Reconsideration of Coalition of Rural Wireless Carriers, GN Docket No. 20-32 (filed Dec. 28, 2020) (“Rural Coalition Petition”), Petition for Partial Reconsideration of CTIA, GN Docket No. 20-32 (filed Dec. 28, 2020) (“CTIA Petition”).

2 See, e.g., Joint Applicants’ Petition for Modification of Decision 20-04-008, In re Joint Application of Sprint Communications Company, L.P. and T-Mobile USA, Inc, California PUC Application 18-07-011 (filed, June 23, 2020), at

3 Rural Coalition Petition at pp. 10-11.

4 Comments of Competitive Carriers Association, GN Docket No. 20-32 (filed February 8, 2021) (“CCA Comments”) at p. 2.

5 CTIA Petition at p. 6.

Source: Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens, Duffy & Prendergast, LLP  

Consulting Alliance

Brad Dye, Ron Mercer, Allan Angus, Vic Jackson, and Ira Wiesenfeld are friends and colleagues who work both together and independently, on wireline and wireless communications projects.

Click here left arrow for a summary of their qualifications and experience. Each one has unique abilities. We would be happy to help you with a project, and maybe save you some time and money.

Note: We do not like Patent Trolls, i.e. “a person or company who enforces patent rights against accused infringers in an attempt to collect licensing fees, but does not manufacture products or supply services based upon the patents in question.” We have helped some prominent law firms defend their clients against this annoyance, and would be happy to do some more of this same kind of work.

Some people use the title “consultant” when they don't have a real job. We actually do consulting work, and help others based on our many years of experience.

“If you would know the road ahead, ask someone who has traveled it.” — Chinese Proverb

WHAT IS 5G? 5G is the ext generation of wireless networks and promises a mobile experience that's 10x to 100x faster than today's 4G networks. We say the word promise because we're in the early days of 5G. When more smartphones and networks support 5G tech, it will have far-reaching consequences for consumers, from the cars we drive (or that drive us) to the food we eat to the safety of our roads to the ways we shop to the entertainment we share with family and friends. And that doesn't include things we haven't yet imagined because we've never had the capability to unlock those new scenarios. Today, 5G may seem confusing even as it's widely hyped. We're here to help you sort fact from fiction, weed through the acronyms and jargon, and figure out when and how 5G can change the way you live. And we'll keep you from getting caught up in hyperbole — and empty promises. [ source ]

Remote AB Switches

ABX-1 switches are often used at remote transmitter sites to convert from old, outdated and unsupported controllers to the new modern Prism-IPX ipBSC base station controllers. Remotely switch to new controllers with GUI commands.


ABX-3 switches are widely used for enabling or disabling remote equipment and switching I/O connections between redundant messaging systems.


Common Features:

  • RJ45 for A, B and Common connectors.
  • Manual push button or use Prism IP commands to switch one or more relays.
  • Single or Dual Port Control card for IP or Serial connection.
  • Form C relay—control local connection.
  • Power Loss Indicator.
  • Rear Panel Connector for controlling the switch externally.
  • Power Source: 5VDC for ABX-1; 12VDC for ABX-3.

Prism-IPX Systems LLC.

11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ph: 678-242-5290 e-mail:

Leavitt Communications

We can supply alphanumeric display, numeric display, and voice pagers.

We also offer NEW and refurbished Alphamate 250s, refurbished Alphamate IIs, the original Alphamate refurbished, and new and refurbished pagers, pager repairs, pager parts, and accessories. We are FULL SERVICE in Paging! Outstanding service is our goal.

E-mail Phil Leavitt ( ) for pricing and delivery information, or for a list of other available paging and two-way related equipment.

Phil Leavitt

7508 N. Red Ledge Drive
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253

Inside Towers Newsletter

Friday, February 19, 2021 Volume 9 | Issue 35

Trade Associations Send Letter to White House: “Build Broadband for All”

February 19, 2021 5:57 am

The heads of three broadband trade associations sent a letter to the White House Thursday urging stronger action on universal broadband access.

Signing the letter were Chip Pickering from INCOMPAS, who represents competitive fiber and fixed wireless builders, Shirley Bloomfield of NTCA–The Rural Broadband Association representing rural providers, and Jonathan Adelstein from WIA, which counts wireless infrastructure companies as members. In the letter, they called on the Biden Administration to make “Broadband for All” central to its COVID-19 recovery efforts as infrastructure investment will stimulate education, telemedicine and small business growth.

The letter states, “Despite best efforts, we still face serious challenges in connecting all Americans, including businesses of all sizes, to high-speed broadband. We realize that the mission to achieve universal broadband availability is an ambitious but essential goal. In order to address the growing digital divide in this country and to expand the availability of faster, more affordable broadband in our communities, we call on your administration, Congress, and the [FCC] to support additional funding for a better broadband future for all Americans.”

The associations call for action that targets underserved areas that need it most, helping low-income Americans stuck on the wrong side of the digital divide purchase broadband services at affordable prices.

The letter calls for federal investment in wired, wireless and 5G infrastructure and better state and local coordination to remove barriers to deployment, ensuring that funding from the FCC’s Emergency Broadband Benefit Program and future investments reach families and communities in need faster, stating, “COVID-19 has exposed deep gaps in Americans’ ability to access the internet, and it is time for our nation’s leaders and for Congress to act. Unfortunately, we hear too often about kids doing homework in parking lots because they lack access to fast, affordable broadband at home. This is a national tragedy. To meet this challenge, we ask the federal government to enable solutions that will make a significant difference in the lives of many.”

Source: Inside Towers newsletter Courtesy of the editor of Inside Towers Jim Fryer.
Inside Towers is a daily newsletter by subscription.

BloostonLaw Newsletter

  BloostonLaw Telecom Update Vol. 24, No. 7 February 17, 2021  

Selected portions [sometimes more — sometimes less — sometimes the whole updates] of the BloostonLaw Telecom Update and/or the BloostonLaw Private Users Update — newsletters from the Law Offices of Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens, Duffy & Prendergast, LLP — are reproduced in this section of The Wireless Messaging News with kind permission from the firm's partners. The firm's contact information is included at the end of this section of the newsletter.

REMINDER: First Performance Measurement Pre-Testing Due March 31

Carriers that accepted support under the ACAM, Revised ACAM, the Alaska Plan, or the Rural Broadband Experiment programs are required to comply with performance measurement pre-testing obligations and report on the results by the last week of each quarter in 2021. The first such report is due by March 31, 2021.

Specifically, carriers must conduct performance measures testing at a random sample of locations selected by USAC and submit the results to USAC within one week of the end of the quarter, but will not face withholding of support for failing to meet speed and latency standards. USAC encourages carriers to file results as soon as pre-testing is complete each quarter.

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Sal Taillefer


House Republicans Announce Broadband Bill Package

On February 16, House Energy and Commerce Republican Leader Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) and Republican Subcommittee Leader for Communications and Technology Bob Latta (R-OH) announced a comprehensive package of 28 bills that “aim to turbocharge public and private investment by promoting new and upgraded infrastructure deployments, boosting competition, streamlining permitting processes, facilitating broadband deployment on federal lands, and closing the digital divide in both rural and urban areas.”

The 28 bills in the package cover a number of areas concerning broadband deployment, including items that:

  • streamline permitting processes at the state and local level by implementing limitations like shot-clocks and cost based fees, and ensuring providers receive answers on applications in reasonable timeframes – including the CONNECT Act, led by Rep. Billy Long (R-MO), which limits government-run broadband networks throughout the country;
  • remove or eliminate environmental and historical preservation reviews for certain deployments, such as on federal property where a communications facility has already been approved; where a carrier seeks to add new or upgraded facilities on existing infrastructure; and areas that are considered brownfields or floodplains;
  • make it easier to provide backup power;
  • make it easier and less expensive to provide service on Federal land.

A more comprehensive summary of each of the 28 bills can be found here.

Reps. McMorris Rodgers and Latta issued the following statement on the bills: “The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified the challenges faced by families and workers who still do not have reliable access to the Internet. This has prevented millions from accessing vital health care, remote work, and economic resources. Unreliable Internet. and limited broadband access has also set countless children back in school because of connectivity issues while far too many schools remain closed. It’s unacceptable and hurting the next generation. To make a strong comeback from this pandemic, every House Republican on Energy and Commerce is leading in the Boosting Broadband Connectivity Agenda so America closes the digital divide. This agenda will get education back on track and promote economic opportunity for all Americans across the entire country.”

Commissioner Carr said, “The Republican Members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee have introduced a smart set of infrastructure reforms that would advance a bold and effective connectivity agenda. Their thoughtful reforms would help close the digital divide and further extend America’s leadership in 5G by helping to accelerate the build out of high-speed connections and boost competition for Americans’ broadband dollars. Their ideas, including legislation that would tackle the permitting delays that persist for Internet. builds on federal lands, would make an immediate difference for rural communities across the country. I applaud their leadership and would encourage everyone that wants better, faster, and cheaper Internet. services to work towards passing this important set of reforms.”

Commissioner Simington said, ““This legislation would create the environment necessary to speedily expand access to broadband for the Americans who need it most. I applaud Congresswoman McMorris Rodgers and her colleagues for their leadership.”

BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens, Gerry Duffy, and John Prendergast.

FCC to Re-Charter NANC, Solicits Nominations

On February 16, the FCC issued a Public Notice announcing that it plans to re-charter the North American Numbering Council (NANC or Council), subject to approval of the General Services Administration’s Federal Advisory Committee Secretariat. Interested parties must submit nominations for NANC membership to the FCC no later than March 18, 2021.

According to the Public Notice, the Council’s mission will be to recommend to the FCC ways to modernize administration of the NANP in order to ensure the efficient, impartial assignment and use of vital numbering resources in the evolving world of communications. The Public Notice further states that the FCC seeks applications from every sector of the telecommunications industry, as well as members representing regulators, standards bodies, and consumer — particularly individuals with expertise and interest in numbering policies, including expertise in network operations and network engineering, representing the following: Wireline and wireless telecommunications service providers of all sizes, including small and mid-size providers; Interconnected Voice over Internet. Protocol and other IP-enabled service providers; Cable service providers; Independent network builders and networking equipment installers; Other entities involved in deploying broadband; Industry trade and standards associations; State, local, and Tribal government regulators and telecommunications officials; Consumer and community organizations; Telecommunications equipment manufacturers; and Other stakeholders and interested parties with relevant experience.

According to the Public Notice, members are required to participate in deliberations of at least one subcommittee or other subgroup, if any are established. The FCC may ask the Council or subcommittees or subgroups to create written recommendations or reports to the FCC. The time commitment for participation in any subcommittee or other subgroup may be substantial. However, subcommittee or other subgroup meetings may be conducted informally, using suitable technology to facilitate the meetings, subject to oversight by the Designated Federal Officer of the NANC.

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast, Cary Mitchell, and Sal Taillefer.

Law and Regulation

Comments on STIR/SHAKEN Certificate Revocation Appeal Process

On February 17, the FCC published in the Federal Register its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing a framework for voice service providers to appeal decisions by the STIR/SHAKEN Governance Authority to revoke Service Provider Code (SPC) tokens. Comments are due March 19, and reply comments are due April 19.

As we reported in a previous edition of the BloostonLaw Telecom Update, the FCC is proposing an oversight role in which it would review the Governance Authority’s token revocation decisions, similar to the role it currently holds in the context of decisions by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC). Indeed, the proposes rules would follow the same format as the rules for appealing a decision of USAC. Under the universal service appeals rules, after first seeking internal review by USAC, an aggrieved party may seek review of USAC’s decision by the FCC. The proposed procedure for STIR/SHAKEN Governance Authority decisions would use similar procedural and timing requirements.

SPC tokens are issued by the STIR/SHAKEN Policy Administrator, and can be revoked by the Governance Authority. The SPC token permits a voice service provider to obtain the digital certificates it will use to authenticate calls from one of the approved Certification Authorities. The SPC token therefore is a prerequisite for a voice service provider to participate in the STIR/SHAKEN ecosystem, and management of token access is the mechanism by which the Policy Administrator and Governance Authority protect the system from abuse and misuse.

Reasons for revoking an SPC can include: 1) compromised credentials, i.e., a voice service provider’s private key has been lost, stolen, or compromised, or a certification authority has been compromised; (2) the voice service provider exits the STIR/SHAKEN ecosystem; (3) the voice service provider fails to adhere to the policy and technical requirements of the system, including the SPC Token Access Policy, funding requirements, or technical specifications regarding the use of STIR/SHAKEN; or (4) when directed by a court, the FCC, or another body with relevant legal authority due to a violation of Federal law related to caller ID authentication.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens, Gerry Duffy, Mary Sisak, and Sal Taillefer.

Comments on NECA Average Schedule Formula Modifications Due March 15

On February 12, the FCC issued a Public Notice seeking comment from interested parties on the proposed modification of average schedule formulas that the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. (NECA) filed on December 23, 2020. As required by the FCC’s rules, NECA proposes to revise the formulas for average schedule interstate settlement disbursements in connection with the provision of interstate access services for the period of July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. Comments are due March 15, and reply comments are due March 30.

Exchange Carriers (ECs) that participate in NECA’s access charge pools receive compensation for providing interstate access services either on the basis of their actual costs or a set of interstate average schedule formulas. Recognizing that it is inefficient to require cost separation studies for all companies as not all ECs have the resources available to perform these studies, the FCC’s rules permit certain ECs to receive interstate access settlements based upon a set of “average schedule” formulas developed by NECA. The FCC’s rules require NECA either to file revised formulas on or before December 31st of each year, or to certify that no such revisions are necessary.

This year’s modification filing can be found here.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens and Sal Taillefer.


Next Meeting of Precision Agriculture Task Force Scheduled for March 12

On February 16, the FCC issued a Public Notice announcing that the next meeting of the Task Force for Reviewing the Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Agriculture in the United States (Precision Ag Connectivity Task Force or Task Force) will be held Friday, March 12, 2021, beginning at 12:00 p.m. (noon) EST. At this meeting, the Task Force will consider and vote on a report from its Accelerating Broadband Deployment on Unserved Agricultural Lands Working Group. The Task Force will also discuss any updates and matters from its other working groups. The meeting will be wholly electronic and is open to the public on the Internet. via live feed from the FCC’s web page at

The Precision Ag Connectivity Task Force provides advice and recommendations for the FCC on how to assess and advance deployment of broadband Internet. access service on unserved agriculture land to promote precision agriculture. Congress directed the FCC, in consultation with the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, to establish the Precision Ag Connectivity Task Force in the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (2018 Farm Bill).


MARCH 1: COPYRIGHT STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT FORM FOR CABLE COMPANIES. This form, plus royalty payment for the second half of last year, is due March 1. The form covers the period July 1 to December 31, and is due to be mailed directly to cable TV operators by the Library of Congress’ Copyright Office. If you do not receive the form, please contact Gerry Duffy.

MARCH 1: CPNI ANNUAL CERTIFICATION. Carriers should modify (as necessary) and complete their “Annual Certification of CPNI Compliance” for this year. The certification must be filed with the FCC by March 1. Note that the annual certification should include the following three required Exhibits: (a) a detailed Statement Explaining How The Company’s Operating Procedures Ensure Compliance With The FCC’S CPNI Rules to reflect the Company’s policies and information; (b) a Statement of Actions Taken Against Data Brokers; and (c) a Summary of Customer Complaints Regarding Unauthorized Release of CPNI. A company officer with personal knowledge that the company has established operating procedures adequate to ensure compliance with the rules must execute the Certification, place a copy of the Certification and accompanying Exhibits in the Company’s CPNI Compliance Records, and file the certification with the FCC in the correct fashion. Our clients can forward the original to BloostonLaw in time for the firm to make the filing with the FCC by March 1, if desired. BloostonLaw is prepared to help our clients meet this requirement, which we expect will be strictly enforced, by assisting with preparation of their certification filing; reviewing the filing to make sure that the required showings are made; filing the certification with the FCC, and obtaining a proof-of-filing copy for your records. Clients interested in obtaining BloostonLaw's CPNI compliance manual should contact Gerry Duffy (202-828-5528). Note: If you file the CPNI certification, you must also file the FCC Form 499-A Telecom Reporting Worksheet by April 1.

BloostonLaw contact: Gerry Duffy.

MARCH 1: FCC FORM 477, LOCAL COMPETITION & BROADBAND REPORTING FORM. This annual form is due March 1 and September 1 annually. The FCC requires facilities-based wired, terrestrial fixed wireless, and satellite broadband service providers to report on FCC Form 477 the number of broadband subscribers they have in each census tract they serve. The Census Bureau changed the boundaries of some census tracts as part of the 2010 Census.

Specifically, three types of entities must file this form:

  1. Facilities-based Providers of Broadband Connections to End User Locations: Entities that are facilities-based providers of broadband connections — which are wired “lines” or wireless “channels” that enable the end user to receive information from and/or send information to the Internet. at information transfer rates exceeding 200 kbps in at least one direction — must complete and file the applicable portions of this form for each state in which the entity provides one or more such connections to end user locations. For the purposes of Form 477, an entity is a “facilities-based” provider of broadband connections to end user locations if it owns the portion of the physical facility that terminates at the end user location, if it obtains unbundled network elements (UNEs), special access lines, or other leased facilities that terminate at the end user location and provisions/equips them as broadband, or if it provisions/equips a broadband wireless channel to the end user location over licensed or unlicensed spectrum. Such entities include incumbent and competitive local exchange carriers (LECs), cable system operators, fixed wireless service providers (including “wireless ISPs”), terrestrial and satellite mobile wireless service providers, BRS providers, electric utilities, municipalities, and other entities. (Such entities do not include equipment suppliers unless the equipment supplier uses the equipment to provision a broadband connection that it offers to the public for sale. Such entities also do not include providers of fixed wireless services (e.g., “Wi-Fi” and other wireless ethernet, or wireless local area network, applications) that only enable local distribution and sharing of a premises broadband facility.)
  2. Providers of Wired or Fixed Wireless Local Telephone Services: Incumbent and competitive LECs must complete and file the applicable portions of the form for each state in which they provide local exchange service to one or more end user customers (which may include “dial-up” ISPs).
  3. Providers of Mobile Telephony Services: Facilities-based providers of mobile telephony services must complete and file the applicable portions of this form for each state in which they serve one or more mobile telephony subscribers. A mobile telephony service is a real-time, two-way switched voice service that is interconnected with the public switched network using an in-network switching facility that enables the provider to reuse frequencies and accomplish seamless handoff of subscriber calls. A mobile telephony service provider is considered “facilities-based” if it serves a subscriber using spectrum for which the entity holds a license that it manages, or for which it has obtained the right to use via lease or other arrangement with a Band Manager.

BloostonLaw contacts: Ben Dickens, Gerry Duffy, and Mary Sisak.

APRIL 1: FCC FORM 499-A, TELECOMMUNICATIONS REPORTING WORKSHEET. This form must be filed by all contributors to the Universal Service Fund (USF) sup-port mechanisms, the Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) Fund, the cost recovery mechanism for the North American Numbering Plan Administration (NANPA), and the shared costs of local number portability (LNP). Contributors include every telecommunications carrier that provides interstate, intrastate, and international telecommunications, and certain other entities that provide interstate telecommunications for a fee. Even common carriers that qualify for the de minimis exemption must file Form 499-A. Entities whose universal service contributions will be less than $10,000 qualify for the de minimis exemption. De minimis entities do not have to file the quarterly report (FCC Form 499-Q), which was due February 1, and will again be due May 1. Form 499-Q relates to universal and LNP mechanisms. Form 499-A relates to all of these mechanisms and, hence, applies to all providers of interstate, intrastate, and international telecommunications services. Form 499-A contains revenue information for January 1 through December 31 of the prior calendar year. And Form 499-Q contains revenue information from the prior quarter plus projections for the next quarter. (Note: the revised 499-A and 499-Q forms are now available.) Block 2-B of the Form 499-A requires each carrier to designate an agent in the District of Columbia upon whom all notices, process, orders, and decisions by the FCC may be served on behalf of that carrier in proceedings before the FCC. Carriers receiving this newsletter may specify our law firm as their D.C. agent for service of process using the information in our masthead. There is no charge for this service.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens, Gerry Duffy, and Sal Taillefer.

APRIL 1: ANNUAL ACCESS TO ADVANCED SERVICES CERTIFICATION. All providers of telecommunications services and telecommunications carriers subject to Section 255 of the Telecommunications Act are required to file with the FCC an annual certification that (1) states the company has procedures in place to meet the record-keeping requirements of Part 14 of the Rules; (2) states that the company has in fact kept records for the previous calendar year; (3) contains contact information for the individual or individuals handling customer complaints under Part 14; (4) contains contact information for the company’s designated agent; and (5) is supported by an affidavit or declaration under penalty of perjury signed by an officer of the company.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Gerry Duffy, Mary Sisak, Sal Taillefer.

Calendar At-a-Glance

Feb. 18 – Replies are due on Petitions for Reconsideration of 5G Fund.

Mar. 1 – Copyright Statement of Account Form for cable companies is due.
Mar. 1 – Annual CPNI Certification is due.
Mar. 1 – FCC Form 477 (Local Competition & Broadband Reporting) is due.
Mar. 3 – Comments on CTS/IP CTS Standards and Metrics are due.
Mar. 15 – Comments are due on Auction 109 Procedures.
Mar. 15 – Comments on NECA Average Schedule Formula are due.
Mar. 18 – NANC nominations are due.
Mar. 19 – STIR/SHAKEN Certificate Revocation comments are due.
Mar. 22 – Reply comments on Auction 109 Procedures are due.
Mar. 30 – Reply comments on NECA Average Schedule Formula are due.
Mar. 31 – FCC Form 525 (Delayed Phasedown CETC Line Counts) is due.
Mar. 31 – FCC Form 508 (ICLS Projected Annual Common Line Requirement) is due.
Mar. 31 – FCC Form 507 (Universal Service Line Count – CAF BLS) is due.
Mar. 31 – Performance Pre-Testing Report for Certain ETCs is due.

Apr. 1 – FCC Form 499-A (Annual Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet) is due.
Apr. 1 – Annual Accessibility Certification is due.
Apr. 2 – Reply comments on CTS/IP CTS Standards and Metrics are due.
Apr. 15 – First Reassigned Number Database Report due (carriers with > 100,000 subscribers).
Apr. 19 –STIR/SHAKEN Certificate Revocation reply comments are due.

Law Offices Of
Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens,
Duffy & Prendergast, LLP

2120 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20037
(202) 659-0830
(202) 828-5568 (fax)


Harold Mordkofsky, 202-828-5520,
Benjamin H. Dickens, Jr., 202-828-5510,
Gerard J. Duffy, 202-828-5528,
John A. Prendergast, 202-828-5540,
Richard D. Rubino, 202-828-5519,
Mary J. Sisak, 202-828-5554,
D. Cary Mitchell, 202-828-5538,
Salvatore Taillefer, Jr., 202-828-5562,

This newsletter is not intended to provide legal advice. Those interested in more information should contact the firm.

Complete Technical Services for the Communications and Electronics Industries

Technical Services Inc.

Texas Registered Engineering Firm #F16945

“It's more than Push-To-Talk”

7711 Scotia Drive
Dallas, TX 75248-3112

Ira Wiesenfeld, P.E.

President • Principal Engineer

Cell: 214-707-7711
Toll Free: 844-IWA-TECH (844-492-8324)

Design  •  Installation  •  Maintenance  •  Training


“The Creeper”

Tuba Skinny


Tuba Skinny

Filmed on location Frenchmen Street, New Orleans, Louisiana
November 13, 2020
By James Sterling




Best regards,
brad's signature
Newsletter Editor
Licensed since 1957
Current member or former member of these organizations.
The National

Rifle Association

mensa member
If you are curious about why I joined Mensa, click here .

A Public Library of
animated gif
Paging and Wireless Messaging
wireless logo medium

Brad Dye
P.O. Box 266
Fairfield, IL 62837 USA

Critical Messaging
European Mobile Messaging Association
emma logo
Former Board Member

Radio Club of Paraguay
Quarter Century
Wireless Association
Back To Paging
Still The Most Reliable
Wireless Protocol
For Emergencies!
American Association

of Woodturners
U.S. Navy

U.S. Navy

radioman second class
Second Class
Petty Officer
Boy Scouts of America

National Honor Society
Creator of the

Paging Wheel of Fortune
National Skeet

Shooting Association
Institute Electrical and
Electronics Engineers

The Radio Club

of America


Life is good!

I am a person in


Skype: braddye
Twitter: @BradDye1
Telephone: +1-618-599-7869
Wireless: Consulting page
Paging: Home Page
Marketing & Engineering Papers
K9IQY: Ham Radio Page

Amateur Radio

  • ex KN9IQY, KN4BK, KM5NK, WB4JCF, ZP5TQ, WA4VXU, WA9RVL, /TI2, /9Y4, /6Y5, /KP4, HH2FJ
  • Licensed FCC Amateur Radio operator since 1957
  • Licensed FCC First-Class-Commercial Operator/Engineer since 1964

United States Navy

Home Page Directory Consulting Newsletters Free Subscription Products Reference Glossary Send e-mail